The Surreal Task of Landing on a Comet

On November 12th 2014 the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission will eject the small robotic lander Philae on a trajectory that should take it down to the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (or 67P/C-P for short).

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


On November 12th 2014 the European Space Agency's Rosetta mission will eject the small robotic lander Philae on a trajectory that should take it down to the surface of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (or 67P/C-P for short). Already Rosetta is maneuvering from its 10 kilometer orbit to get into the right place to deploy Philae.

The landing site is on the 'head' of the rubber-duck shaped cometary nucleus (although it might also be likened to a half-eaten, and rather rotten apple core). This target area has now been named 'Agilkia' after an island in the Nile river here on Earth - a place where the ancient Temple of Isis was moved to after its original island home of Philae was flooded during the construction of the Aswan dam.

It represents a remarkable stage in the history of space exploration, but perhaps equally extraordinary is the tangible sense of just how alien and surreal this place is. Here is an image from 27 kilometers away, showing the landing site atop the bizarre tower of the cometary nucleus.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The top of the 'duck's head' where Philae will attempt to land (Credit: ESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM)

Looking down from a different viewing angle the Agilkia site is shown here - expected to be somewhere within the 1 kilometer diameter red circle.

The Philae landing area (ESA/Rosetta/MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/SSO/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA)

To get a slightly different perspective on the whole environment, here's 67P/C-P in full, with a hint of the out-gassing that's occurring from the 'neck' of the nucleus as volatiles sublimate away, carrying dust into interplanetary space. End-to-end the nucleus is about 4 kilometers.

View from 28 kilometers away (ESA/Rosetta/NAVCAM)

During November 11-12th a go/no-go decision will be made on the release of Philae. With a 28 minute one-way light travel time from Earth this will be an entirely autonomous operation if given the 'go'.

It'll take Philae about 7 hours to drop towards Agilkia - and here's one of the trickiest and most nerve-wracking pieces of the landing. The nucleus of 67P/C-P is spinning, like an end-over-end dumbbell (yep, rubber duck, apple core, dumbbell, no single description quite captures the nature of this object). If that spin holds steady at about 12.4 hours per rotation Philae should hit the right spot - but as the comet heats up and loses material the spin rate may shift by tiny amounts.

With some luck it should all work out fine, but if you watch the following ESA video you'll see (around 0:50) that it's a bit like a fairground game where you try to hit a crazily tumbling target for the prize (except here you really want the prize).

If Philae lands successfully it'll fire up a host of experiments and instruments - using up the energy of its primary battery over the course of about 64 hours.

After that point Philae's life-expectancy hinges on how well its solar panels can recharge those batteries - hopefully well enough to take it through 67P/C-P's closest approach to the Sun in March 2015.

The descent procedure for Philae (ESA)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe