October 11, 2011

#SciAmBlogs Tuesday - feminine fertility and fecundity framing, etc.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

As always, some awesome stuff on the network today:

- Scicurious - The more feminine you look, the more children you want. It must be science.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

- Kate Clancy - Framing and definitions: are you maternal enough to be a woman?

- Ingrid Wickelgren - Decoding Sexual Desire: Why You’re Into It—or Not

- Maria Konnikova - Lessons from Sherlock Holmes: Don’t Judge a Man by His Face

- Michael J. Battaglia - I Was a Teenage Element Hoarder

- John Horgan - Dear Occupy Wall Street: Read Jeffrey Sachs!

- Darren Naish - The seemingly endless weirdosity of the Milu

- John R. Platt - Mystery Tiger Deaths Solved: Canine Distemper Plagues Siberian Tigers

- Glendon Mellow - Parasites and Phenotypes: the art of scientist Tommy Leung

- Bora Zivkovic - Introducing #SciAmBlogs bloggers: S.E.Gould

- Bora Zivkovic - #Scio11 – Making the History of Science [Video]

- Jason G. Goldman - Donors Choose Update: Mr. Vizthum FUNDED!andEditor’s Selections: Of Pain and Pedophiles

=======================

Conversations on our articles and blog posts often continue on our Facebook page - "Like" it and join in the discussion.

You should follow the Blog Network on Twitter - the official account is @sciamblogs and the List of all the bloggers is @sciamblogs/sciambloggers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American