#SciAmBlogs Tuesday – Heidelberg Laureate Forum, science “wine snobs”, infested female crickets, tearless onion, socialist iPhone, funny citations, and more.
- Pete Monfre and Maggie Bencivenga – The Sea Change in Science Education: Corporate Stakeholders Step Up. - Dana Mackenzie – A Warrior for the Blind - Beatrice Lugger – Calistus N.
By Bora Zivkovic
This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
- Pete Monfre and Maggie Bencivenga - The Sea Change in Science Education: Corporate Stakeholders Step Up.
- Dana Mackenzie - A Warrior for the Blind
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
- Beatrice Lugger - Calistus N. Ngonghala: Break the Vicious Cycles of Poverty and Disease
- Scicurious - IgNobels 2013: The Tearless Onion
- Felicity Muth - Infested female crickets are less choosy in who they have sex with
- See Arr Oh - Science “Wine Snobs”
- Scott Huler - A socialist iPhone?
- Bonnie Swoger - A few funny* things about citations
- Katie McKissick - Unique Art Pendants
- Jason G. Goldman - High-Flying Frog Was Not The First Amphibian To Reach For Outer Space
- DNLee - Applications open for undergrad mentoring & travel awards to attend the Joint Aquatic Sciences Meeting May 2014
- The Editors - A New Scientific American eBook, Understanding Addiction, Examines the Multifaceted Issue of Substance Abuse
=======================
Conversations on our articles and blog posts often continue on our Facebook page - "Like" it and join in the discussion. You can also put our official Google Plus page in your circles and check out our Pinterest page.
You should follow the Blog Network on Twitter - the official account is @sciamblogs and the List of all the bloggers is @sciamblogs/sciambloggers.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
