Tuesday Tremors at the #SciAmBlogs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Today was a breaking news day, the kind where science offers its explanations. So our editors got busy and provided a lot of material - news, explainers, slideshows, etc. and then they also took to the blogs and covered the East Coast earthquake:

 

- David Biello - Earthquake Shakes East Coast


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

- Anna Kuchment - Get your own earthquake sensor, and other temblor tips

 

- Katherine Harmon - Top 10 Biggest East Coast Quakes on Record

 

The rest of the network and the rest of the topics:

- Krystal D'Costa - Crossing the Streams: #NYCSciTweetUp and The Story Collider Together!

 

- Kate Clancy - Non-science majors: now it’s your turn

 

- Scicurious - High Fructose Corn Syrup: Much Maligned? Or the Devil’s Food Cake?

 

- Melissa C. Lott - David MacKay: Sustainable Energy – without the hot air

 

- Emily Grubert - Why Business-as-Usual Coal Consumption Could Mean Dramatic Changes

 

- Bora Zivkovic - Introducing #SciAmBlogs bloggers: Kate Clancy

 

- Peter Norvig - Prescient but Not Perfect: A Look Back at a 1966 Scientific American Article on Systems Analysis (for this occasion, we republished the original article by Christopher Strachey - System Analysis and Programming)

- Charles Q. Choi - Too Hard for Science? Does Evolutionary Logic Explain Wicked Stepparents?

 

- Krystal D'Costa - Observations: This Seat’s For You

 

- Christina Agapakis - Editing the City

 

- Jennifer Frazer - Alpine Toads and the Chytrids that Love Them

 

- Jason G. Goldman - Editor’s Selections: Mirrors, Misdiagnoses, Variable Adolescence, and Reindeer Vision

 

- Maria Konnikova - Lessons from Sherlock Holmes: Paying Attention to What Isn't There

 

- Darren Naish - Why putting your hand in a peccary’s mouth is a really bad idea

 

- Amir D. Aczel - A Higgs Setback: Did Stephen Hawking Just Win the Most Outrageous Bet in Physics History?

 

=======================

If you like any of the posts by our bloggers and if you think the posts can be easily edited and formatted for print, submit them for the next edition of The Open Laboratory.

Conversations on our articles and blog posts often continue on our Facebook page - "Like" it and join in the discussion.

You should follow the Blog Network on Twitter - the official account is @sciamblogs and the List of all the bloggers is @sciamblogs/sciambloggers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe