Allergy Relief: real-time pollen updates may be on the way

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Good news for allergy sufferers: Researchers may have hit upon a fast, new way to detect circulating pollen using a common laboratory technique that would provide instant updates of which types of the allergen are circulating in the air.  So far, the technique has only been shown to work in a lab, but it paves the way for a quicker detection system in the future, scientists report today in the journal Analytical Chemistry.

"[Pollen-counting] is a very time-consuming process," says David Shulan, an allergist at Certified Allergy and Asthma Consultants in Albany, New York. "It takes a lot of training to be able to identify the pollens. . . .  It would be nice if we could do things quicker" he adds, noting that a real-time automated pollen-detection system might help allergists make more accurate diagnoses.

Currently, pollen counters rely on the tedious process of collecting pollen (the sperm-packed powdery substance carried from one plant to the next by insects or wind currents) from the air and inspecting samples under microscopes. Take, for example, the National Allergy Bureau, a pollen-counting organization run by the nonprofit American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology (AAAAI). The bureau has 70 pollen-counting stations across the U.S. that issue reports daily or every few days. This can leave hay fever sufferers in the dark for a day or longer.

The new so-called Raman spectroscopy method could potentially provide doctors and allergy sufferers with hourly updates. The technique involves shining a laser on samples of pollen grains, which causes proteins, nucleic acids, and other molecules in those grains to vibrate and scatter the laser light.

By comparing the energy of the laser before and after it hits the pollen, scientists can make inferences about the chemical composition of the pollen. These energy differences are visually represented by Raman spectra, graphs depicting laser wavelength versus intensity.  As this study shows, different pollen species have characteristic or "fingerprint" spectra, allowing scientists to distinguish among pollen from different plant species.

"As illustrated by the data, the spectra of whole pollen can be used for their classification," the researchers write. "Such an approach is particularly promising, considering its potential to be employed for automatic pollen detection and warning."

No word on when it might be available for daily use, and lead study author Janina Kneipp, a chemist at Germany's Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, declined to comment for the story.

Image credit ©iStockphoto.com/Pidjoe

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe