Can fearful memories be erased?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the movie Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Joel and Clementine's relationship ends so sourly that the couple elects to have their mutual memories swept away via a non-surgical procedure called "targeted memory erasure." No such tool actually exists. Even the most intense therapies can't completely erase troubling or fearful memories in adults. Yet, if two young rats fall in and out of love—or, more likely, have a close encounter with a subway car—permanent memory erasure may actually be possible, previous research has suggested. So, what happens in a growing rodent brain to cause this change?

A new study on mice uncovers some answers that could someday offer a potent target for eliminating the recurrence of bad memories in humans, especially known to those who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

"Fear memories are the most robust memories—they can last over a lifetime," says Nadine Gogolla, a biologist at Harvard University and lead author on the paper published today in the journal Science. "You can push them far back, but spontaneous recovery and relapses will happen." Until now, science has been unable to stop this process—in humans or in mice. 

By repeating the previously reported rat findings, Gogolla and her colleagues found that at some point during a young mouse's development—between about 16 and 23 days postnatal—a molecular net of sorts is cast over a region of the brain called the amygdala, effectively crystallizing formerly malleable memories.

"It looks just like what you would expect from a fisherman's net," says Gogolla of the protein matrix under the microscope. "And it acts as a structural constraint on the cells. How it does that, nobody really knows." But the result is that memories are held inside. 

What the researchers did learn was that by cutting that net—with an injection of an enzyme that digests the chains linking the matrix together—memories could be once again destabilized.

"The drug cuts the net into its pieces," Gogolla says, "just like when you cut the strings of a net and it falls apart." Then, for a couple weeks, the original youthful plasticity in the neuronal circuits of the amygdala is regained and any bad memory formed after the matrix digestion could be subsequently eliminated through "extinction" therapy, a common treatment during which a patient is presented with the original fear trigger but in a context that is not fearful. When the treatment was given after a mouse underwent fear conditioning, however, extinction was unable cut out that memory completely.

"Because the treatment has to occur before a traumatic event, it's hard to make it immediately available," notes Gogolla. "But it does help us in finding the underlying mechanisms." Eventually, she hopes tools can be found that can be applied after fear-inducing experiences, and that translate from mice to humans. This would be welcome relief for the approximately 20 percent of all military personel who have returned from Iraq and Afghanistan reporting symptoms of PTSD, not to mention for heartbroken couples.

Also see our podcast on this research.

Picture by Don89 via iStockphoto

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe