Debate over who owns your Facebook info continues

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Facebook is once again facing a loud chorus of complaints from its faithful over how their personal information is used. Earlier this week, news of a February 4 change to the site's terms of service trickled out to users courtesy of The Consumerist, a Consumers Union blog. That change, according to The Consumerist, meant that Facebook could now use information you upload "in any way they deem fit, forever, no matter what you do later." (Here’s a link to the Facebook terms of service.)

Facing a public relations crisis, chief executive Mark Zuckerberg clarified his company's position, writing, "Our philosophy is that people own their information and control who they share it with."

Facebook users took issue with the deletion of a provision in the terms of service that said users could remove their content at any time, at which time the license would expire, and added new language that said Facebook would retain users' content and licenses after an account was terminated, The New York Times reported. Zuckerberg, however, indicated that the change in language was done for pragmatic reasons: Even when a Facebook user deactivates an account, any messages and other information (e-mail addresses or phone numbers, for example) shared with his or her friends are still in that friend's inbox or on their wall.

Zuckerberg chalked the issue up to a lack of technology. "There is no system today that enables me to share my email address with you and then simultaneously lets me control who you share it with and also lets you control what services you share it with," Zuckerberg wrote.

This wasn't Facebook's first foray into a public relations crisis over privacy: In 2007, the site found itself in a similar situation when it introduced Beacon, software on its site that tracks members' activity when they visit sites–including Blockbuster and eBay–that have partnered with Facebook on the endeavor. In earlier versions of the software, your movie viewing or purchasing habits could be sent to your Facebook page–without your explicit permission–for all of your network of friends to see. More than 50,000 Facebook users signed a petition protesting the new program, which prompted the site to notify users before passing along updates about their activities on partner sites and let users cancel these updates if they so desired.

Image ©iStockphoto.com/Stepan Popov

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe