Major U.S. recycler vows not to ship e-waste abroad

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Just days after congressional investigators slammed companies for shipping e-waste overseas (and the feds for failing to crack down on them), a major U.S. recycler today vowed to stop the practice. Waste Management, based in Houston, today announced that it would not send hazardous electronic garbage to developing countries for recycling.

E-waste includes the remains of computers and other electronic devices, which often contain toxic heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury. U.S. consumers and companies toss about two million tons (four billion pounds) of e-waste annually, according to the EPA. Some of this rubbish is then shipped to developing countries, where workers, many without proper protection, are exposed to dangerous chemicals while stripping out valuable metals such as copper.

Waste Management announced today that it had signed the "Electronics Recycler’s Pledge of True Stewardship," a document developed by the Seattle-based watchdog enviro group The Basel Action Network. The pledge requires companies to get rid of electronic components in an ecologically responsible way, not dump it in landfills or send it to be disassembled by prisoners or workers overseas and to document where the waste ends up.

(Image from iStockphoto/LyaC)

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe