Monsanto puts bovine growth hormone out to pasture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After years of legal wrangling over the proper labeling of milk from cows treated with its artificial hormone, Monsanto wants to sell its milk business—specifically, POSILAC, the bovine growth hormone given to cows to boost their production of milk.

In recent years, Monsanto had been suing milk producers who explicitly labeled their product as hormone free, arguing that was false advertising since all milk has natural hormones in it. And recent studies had argued that recombinant bovine growth hormone delivered global warming benefits: its boosting of milk production could decrease the number of cows needed to produce the same amount of milk.

But now the agricultural giant wants to give up the milk fight to concentrate on its core genetically modified seed business, which has also not been without controversy.

Consumers have made it fairly clear they don’t want milk from cows treated with the artificial hormone. At one point, more than 22 percent of U.S. cows were on the hormone. As of 2007, only 17 percent still were, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In recent years, major companies including Kraft Foods, Starbucks and Wal-Mart have announced decisions to sell only milk products from untreated cows. This "will limit our future sales" admitted Monsanto.

Consumer health advocates rejoiced because of links to various health effects, including the birth of more twins. "Monsanto has recognized that consumers have made a choice to avoid milk made with genetically engineered growth hormones," said Andrew Kimbrell, co-founder and executive director of the Center for Food Safety in a statement. "They have clearly judged the time right to get out of the failing artificial growth hormone business."

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe