New drug shows early promise in small Alzheimer's trial

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A drug called PBT2, developed by Australian company Prana Biotechnology, appears to improve cognitive abilities in patients with early-stage Alzheimer's disease.  Researchers report in Lancet Neurology, that it was also successful in reducing protein buildup associated with the debilitating neurodegenerative illness, which plagues up to 4.5 million Americans.

Craig Ritchie, a neuroscientist at Imperial College London and Prana consultant, says that the success of the recent 12-week trial (which had 78 participants) -- must be replicated in a larger longer-term trial before the company would consider seeking approval to sell it as an Alzheimer's therapy. "Our hope is that we might be able to see treatments that can substantially improve the lives of people with Alzheimer's disease within the next five or so years," he said in a statement.

Patients in the trial took two rounds of exams to assess their cognitive abilities—one at the beginning of the treatment cycle and one after 12 weeks. The tests probed so-called executive function, organizational abilities, planning and reasoning.  Among them: how many words that fit into a certain category volunteers could fire off and how quickly they could connect related circles filled with letters or numbers on a sheet of paper.

Patients who received 250 mg of PBT2 were able to come up with three more words on the category test then they did before their treatment. Participants who received placeboes, on the other hand, performed worse on average after the 12-week period was up than they did at the outset. The treated population also connected the trails between the circles nearly 50 seconds faster than they did before receiving PBT2. The untreated group also performed more poorly on this task at the end of the trial period.

In addition to improved executive function, the treated population showed a reduction in the protein amyloid beta in their spinal fluid—a proxy measure for what happens in the brain. Amyloid beta, with the help of metals, such as zinc and copper, forms clumps called plaques around neurons or nerve cells in the brain. These plaques disrupt the cell function and can lead to cell death. PBT2 works by decreasing the level of zinc and copper, which are elevated in an Alzheimer's brain. In patients treated with PBT2, amyloid beta levels fell by 13 percent relative to the placebo group.

The researchers report no serious side effects as a result of the PBT2 treatment regimen. Norman Relkin, a neurologist at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City, wrote in a Lancet Neurology editorial that PBT2 still needs to prove safe and effective in larger clinical trials. If it gets over that hurdle, the drug  would support a link between high levels of metals, such as zinc and copper, and Alzheimer's disease.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe