New RPI center features marriage of arts and sciences

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


TROY, N.Y.—Eight years and $200 million in the making, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's Experimental Media and Performing Arts Center (EMPAC) made its debut today on the school's campus here. RPI is billing the EMPAC as a place where artists, visiting scholars, researchers, engineers and designers can explore how their disciplines intersect and use the center's large video screens and super-computer hookup to create immersive, interactive presentations.

RPI president Shirley Ann Jackson called the EMPAC a "balance between left and right brain endeavors" during the center's opening ceremonies and likened the project to a particle accelerator, "an eruption, if you will, of discovery and transformation."

Peter Schwartz, founder and chairman of the San Francisco business consulting firm Global Business Network and a 1968 RPI graduate, noted at the festivities that RPI has come a long way since he was a student, when "art was a thing that was quite peripheral to our lives," he said.

The EMPAC's role will depend on how faculty and students utilize the space. One idea is to use the massive screens and meticulously designed acoustics to create a "holodeck" much like the one featured in the Enterprise spaceship in the television show Star Trek: The Next Generation for training and entertainment, says Selmer Bringsjord, director of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's Artificial Intelligence & Reasoning Lab and chairman of the school's department of cognitive science.

In addition to being a state-of-the-art performance space with 220,000 square feet (20,439 square meters) of theaters, studios and work spaces, the center has a very high bandwidth connection to RPI's Computational Center for Nanotechnology Innovations, which has at its heart an IBM Blue Gene supercomputer consisting of 32,768 parallel processors.

Among the goals: to allow artists and researchers to visualize their work on an unprecedented scale; instead of a computer screen measuring 1,000 pixels by 1,000 pixels, data can be projected on a 360-degree panoramic screen covering all four walls and measuring 4,000 pixels by 4,000 pixels. "Supercomputing is generally not interactive," notes James Hendler, an RPI professor of computer science and cognitive science. He adds that this could change if researchers find a way to create interactive presentations—such as a lecture about physics or a demonstration of a virtual world—in which complex calculations are performed and incorporated in real time. "EMPAC will start as technology support for the arts," he says, "but will benefit technology as well."

The EMPAC is similar to MIT's Media Lab, which opened its doors in 1985. The difference: the Media Lab has dabbled in the artistic works with programs such as Object-Based Media, Opera of the Future and Music, Mind and Machine, but the EMPAC plans to merge art with research done on RPI's campus and provide a venue for viewing the results.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


(Hybrid Space and the Panoramic Screen by Workspace Unlimited. Photo by Thomas Soetens, © Workspace Unlimited 2008.)

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe