Obama scuttles Bush offshore drilling plan

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Obama administration today shelved a Bush administration plan to allow drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, delaying a final decision on the controversial policy for at least six months to give states, enviros and others time to weigh in on it.

In announcing the move, Interior Sec. Ken Salazar said that more time was needed to mull offshore renewable energy alternatives "torpedoed" by Bush officials in favor of oil and natural gas. "To establish an orderly process that allows us to make wise decisions based on sound information, we need to set aside" the plan, he said in a statement, "and create our own timeline."

Salazar also ordered the Interior Department to report on potential renewable energy sources such as wave and wind on the Outer Continental Shelf (where the feds oversee 1.7 billion acres), noting that the Bush policy was based on data that is "thin" and at least 20 to 30 years old.

"We shouldn't make decisions to sell off taxpayer resources based on old information," he said.

Congress last year failed to renew a decades-old moratorium on oil and gas exploration across 85 percent of the Outer Continental Shelf, which left all waters previously off limits (estimated to hold billions of untapped barrels of oil and trillions of cubic feet of natural gas) potentially open to exploration.

But four days before Bush left office, officials issued a draft plan that called for the Interior Department to open areas off the East Coast and the coasts of California and Alaska to oil and gas exploration during a five-year period from 2010 to 2015. (Offshore drilling is already allowed in the Gulf of Mexico.)
 
Environmentalists and coastal states were up in arms, arguing that drilling could lead to spills (that could sully the waters and harm fish and wildlife) and that the feds' should shift their focus from oil and gas to renewable energy sources.

Salazar said that when he issues a final rulemaking "in the coming months," it "will allow us to move from the 'oil and gas' only approach of the previous administration."

"We must embrace President Obama's vision of energy independence," he added, "for the sake of our national security, our economic security, and our environmental security."

The move comes a week after House Republicans urged Obama to keep the Pacific and Atlantic coastlines open for (oil and gas) business.

Image credit: ccgd via Flickr

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe