On "pot smokers' day," a study showing your brain makes something like marijuana

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the last year, marijuana (or, more precisely, THC, the chemical behind cannabis' kick) has been linked to sharper recall and warding off superbugs. The problem is that along with those potential effects that are good for sick people, the mental impairment, disorientation, and other psychoactive effects of THC are "a major problem" that limits its usefulness, says Lakshmi A. Devi, a researcher at the Department of Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York.

The things that make for a good high are, perversely, a major drag if you're a chemo patient just trying to exploit the appetite-restoring properties of THC or a rheumatoid arthritis sufferer looking for a decent anti-inflammatory drug.

So Devi and her colleagues have been looking for a compound that has the good effects -- that is, the good effects for a person with cancer, for example -- without the bad ones. And now they seem to have found some, according to their report in the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) Journal. Even more exciting: the newly-discovered THC-mimicking proteins are produced by the brain.

Inside your head, as it were, you may have the power to make yourself high.

If the receptor can be toggled by these peptides, there may be a way to develop highly-targeted drugs—ones that switch the cannabinoid receptor on, and off (a recent weight-loss drug trial involved tried blocking it, although the trial was halted early) at will—without THC's "downsides."   

So when do we get these wonder drugs? Alas, there's still much to be done. For one, the peptide Devi and her colleagues found was in mice, and, according to Devi, there's no saying when a human trial could begin: "Could be months...could be years....could be never," she says.

But perhaps it won't be too long a wait. Gerry Weissmann, the FASEB Journal's editor-in-chief, for one, has seen "the cannabinoid receptor story developing into a major field of science (not only neuroscience) and the number of papers dealing with these receptors submitted to our journal have increased by about 50 percent since 2006."

We should note -- perhaps with our eyebrows raised -- that the study was published online on April 20. For those of you older than, say, 19, we might have to explain that "420" is slang for pot. And since we will claim to have never heard that anyway, we certainly won't profess to know why, although snopes.com has a good almost-answer. So last Monday, tens of thousands around the world engaged in a highly uncontrolled experiment with a controlled substance: They got high.

Weissmann insists the publication date was "chance, not choice."

Photo by TorbenH via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe