Polar bears will destroy the American way of life

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The real threat isn't a changing climate upsetting the foundation of human civilization. The real threat is polar bears: At least that's the real threat according to many attendees at the recent Heartland Institute conference on global warming. And let's not forget, as physicist and noted contrarian S. Fred Singer told the conference: "Polar bears like to eat tiny little seal pups." In fact, the only animal that came in for more frequent condemnation was Al Gore. Lurking behind the polar bear, of course, is that most nefarious foe: government bureaucrats. And they are what really drives contrarians like Singer in their anti-climate change crusade. It's not necessarily a passionate belief that global warming isn't happening but a passionate belief in the fact that no government (or, at least, less government) is good government. The present administration seems to share this belief, running afoul of the law while trying to run out the clock on a pending decision as to whether the polar bear should be listed as an endangered species or not. The government has missed two deadlines, including one during the Heartland conference itself, to make a decision. In many ways, as the Washington Post reported this weekend, the current government is opposed to endangered species, for example shifting the definition of a species' range from where a given animal or plant has historically been found to the far more restricted areas in which it presently exists. The polar bear is threatened by climate change, according to the U.S. Geological Survey if not yet the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. And the climate contrarian is threatened by those agencies scientists and bureaucrats--and Al Gore. -- Edited by dbiello at 03/24/2008 12:44 PM -- Edited by dbiello at 03/24/2008 1:33 PM

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe