Powerful quake rocks Honduras, 4 confirmed dead

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A powerful earthquake struck off the Caribbean coast near Honduras this morning, leaving four or more dead on shore, and injuring 40 others.

The magnitude 7.1 earthquake was centered 75 miles north of La Ceiba at 3:24 a.m. this morning (2:24 a.m. eastern time), according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Four children are confirmed dead, but Randolfo Funes of Honduras’ civil protection agency told Reuters, “There will be many more dead.”

Honduras will temporarily shut down Puerto Cortes, the port that handles as many as 80 percent of its exports, primarily banana, coffee, coconut, and hardwoods.  And Agence France Presse reports that more than two dozen homes and 10 schools  were destroyed and a bridge spanning the Ulua, Honduras’ largest river, has collapsed.

The earthquake comes four months after a 6.2 magnitude quake killed dozens of residents and stranded tourists in nearby Costa Rica.

To learn more about earthquakes, check out our in-depth report.

Location of May 28, 2009 earthquake in Honduras courtesy U.S. Geological Survey

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe