Saving the environment from behind bars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Paid just 85 cents per hour, inmates at a Seattle-area prison provide a relatively inexpensive source of scientific labor. But who knew they could also grow frogs better than some traditional research facilities?

The Seattle Times reports today about the stunning success a pair of inmates have had raising endangered Oregon spotted frogs at the Ceder Creek Corrections Center. Only eight frogs have died out of the 80 eggs the two men started with in early April—a loss rate well below that of two zoos and a wildlife park that are also involved in the research project.

Over the last few months, Harry Greer and Albert Delp have taken careful notes while watching eggs transform into tadpoles and then frogs. They will continue with their responsibilities, which also include feedings and tank water changes, until the planned release of the frogs this fall.

“They have time to address care on a level that is not possible with those other institutions,” Marc P. Hayes, a senior researcher at the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife and leader of the project, told The Seattle Times. “They baby those things literally night and day.”

Reviving an endangered frog that was once widespread in the Puget Sound region is just one of many environmental efforts underway at four facilities through the Sustainable Prisons Project, a partnership between the Washington State Department of Corrections and The Evergreen State College. In Cedar Creek alone, inmates research mosses, compost food waste, and tend to gardens that grow approximately 15,000 pounds of food annually.  Soon, they will be informing the controversy of colony collapse disorder by raising and studying bees.

In addition to the benefits for the economy and ecosystems of the Pacific Northwest, “the benefit for the prisoners is multifaceted,” explains Sarah Clarke, a graduate assistant involved in evaluating the project. “They gain a real sense of pride and accomplishment as well as skills for when they reenter society.”

One former inmate, Craig Ulrich, even ended up a first author on a peer-reviewed paper and is now pursuing a PhD in biochemistry at the University of Nevada, Reno. With skills honed on scientific investigation, ex-cons could go a lot further than they ever could with license-plate stamping.

Images of inmates and Oregon spotted frog by Benjamin Drummond

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe