Got a sexy science project? Call Hugh Hefner for funding

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If you show up to the New York Academy of Medicine the night of April 27th, you'll hear journalist Tom Maier discuss his new biography of famous sex researchers William Masters and Virginia Johnson. (Maier reveals some of what he dug up on the truth behind "gay conversion" therapy in this Perspective for ScientificAmerican.com.)

What you'll see if you look at who sponsored the event, however, is another familiar name: Hugh Hefner.

The Playboy founder's sponsorship of next week's event through the Hugh M. Hefner Foundation is in keeping with the Foundation's support of freedom and sexuality, says foundation spokesperson Matthew Pakula. Masters and Johnson were, of course, the husband and wife team often credited with starting the practice of sex therapy for couples. They studied the psychology and physiology of lovemaking from 1957 until the 1990s. (As for their own conjugal bliss, one can only speculate, but their marriage ended in an amicable divorce in 1992.)  

Among their findings: Women can have multiple orgasms without a “refractory period” in between, unlike men, in whom many cases of impotence and premature ejaculation have a strong psychological basis.

Such sexy science is not the only apple of Hugh Hefner’s eye, however. According to the non-profit’s 2007 tax form, the organization has provided more than $225,000 in grants to a variety of institutions, a number of them science and medicine-based. Several thousands of dollars went to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and the National Asthma Association, for example.

The Hugh M. Hefner Foundation also lends financial support to the Guttmacher Institute, a sexual and reproductive health science research center, as well as progressive groups including NARAL Pro-Choice Foundation and Planned Parenthood. “We want to get good scientific information out to women so they can make reproductive health choices for themselves,” says Pakula.

The foundation also tries to make sure that becoming Miss March isn't the only career path for women, supporting the Women’s Business Development Center and Women Make Movies, a non-profit media arts organization promoting the making of movies about women by women (and no, not those kinds of movies).

Hefner also supports the arts with donations to, among others, the Los Angeles Philharmonic Association, the Berklee College of Music, and the Multicultural Motion Picture Association.

“People don’t realize Mr. Hefner’s philanthropic interests,” says Pakula. “It’s not a side of him that often gets covered in the press.”

Which is shocking, really.

Image credit: iStockphoto/braddy

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe