Sniffing out toxic chemicals--With colors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Miners had canaries; physicists and medical technicians get radiation badges. But for those in other labs or factories with toxic chemicals, there has long been a need for practical sensors to warn workers when chemical concentrations get dangerous.

Many groups have tried to develop such devices, but some have been too expensive or unreliable in extreme conditions. A new prototype promises to deliver a practical, humidity-proof answer just by changing color, almost like a mood ring. The current version is portable, but the developers hope that it will soon be something workers could wear.

"Our device is simply a digital multidimensional extension of litmus paper," Ken Suslick, a professor of chemistry at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, said in a prepared statement.

The device relies on a square of 36 colored dots—made from nanoporous pigments—printed on paper, glass or plastic. A small scanner or camera captures changes in the colored dots for analysis. "The pattern of the color change is a unique molecular fingerprint for any toxic gas and also tells us its concentration," Suslick said. "By comparing the pattern to a library of color fingerprints, we can identify and quantify the TICs [toxic industrial chemicals] in a matter of seconds." The researchers reported no misclassifications in more than 140 trials.

The device boasts more refined detection capabilities than previous efforts, which have relied on more low-strength chemical interactions. The dyes used, the researchers report, are able to respond to a wide catalogue of common, harmful chemicals and register even before toxins exceed permissible exposure limits (PELs).

"Given the broad range of chemicals that can be detected and the high sensitivity of the array to those compounds, it appears that this device will be particularly useful in occupational settings," David Balshaw, a program administrator at National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NEIHS), which funded the study, said in a prepared statement.

Other research groups are also working with nanotechnology to create portable sensors. A research team at Ohio State University has been working with metal-oxide nanoparticles, which can detect toxic chemicals, they reported in a paper in Materials Chemistry and Physics earlier this year. "These are sensors that a soldier could wear on the battlefield, or a first responder could wear to an accident at a chemical plant," Patricia Morris, an associate professor of materials science and engineering at Ohio State and research leader, said in a prepared statement. Their work relies on the change of electrical conductance rather than change in color to detect the presence of chemicals.

The Illinois-based group's results were published online yesterday in Nature Chemistry (Scientific American is a member of the Nature Publishing Group).

"This paper brings us one step closer to having a small wearable sensor that can detect multiple airborne toxins," Linda Birnbaum, director of the NIEHS, said in a prepared statement.

The Illinois group's prototype is now being developed into a commercial product by Palo Alto, Calif.- and Champaign-based iSense.

Image of the device and the postage stamp-sized dot array courtesy of Kenneth Suslick/University of Illinois

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe