Space station urine recycling system still on the fritz

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Turning urine into drinkable water apparently isn't so easy. At least not in space. As the space shuttle Endeavour and International Space Station (ISS) crews gear up for tomorrow's scheduled seven-hour spacewalk, they're still wondering what to do with their malfunctioning $250 million water-and-urine recycling system. The processor ran for about two hours today before shutting itself down, reports SpaceFlight Now. This failure follows yesterday's tense moments, when the urine processor assembly set off an alarm on the space station as astronauts attempted to test it, according to Space.com.

The astronauts have yet to determine what triggered what they believe to be a false alarm,  because they didn't  detect any smoke or a combustible odor, the Associated Press reports today. NASA is playing down the incident, noting that systems installed on the space station are complicated and that troubleshooting to get to the bottom of problem is not unusual. It took several attempts in 2006, for example, to get the new oxygen generator to work properly.

As Scientific American.com reported in October, 2007, a water-recovery system collects urine from the astronauts and condensation from the cabin air and, through a series of chemical treatments and filters, turns that moisture into potable water. The first step involves filtering solid particles such as skin cells and hair out of the liquid. After that, contaminants are chemically dissolved and oxygen is added to the liquid to oxidize trace organics so that they, too, can be removed. Next, the liquid is "polished," meaning chemicals left over from the cleaning process are removed. Finally, iodine is added for microbial control, much the way municipal water authorities add chlorine to city drinking water. The resulting liquid is sent to a large storage tank, which can be tapped for drinking.

In case you're wondering, astronauts aren't planning to sample any of the recycled urine during this trip. Instead, they  plan to bring samples from each stage of the water recycling system, including the urine processor, back to Earth aboard Endeavour to conduct quality control studies, reports Space.com, which has a video in which NASA demonstrates how the machine works.

NASA wants to test and monitor the system for several months before giving astronauts the okay to drink from it. The successful recycling of sweat, urine and other moisture aboard the shuttles and space station are crucial to NASA's plans to double the ISS's crew to six people and eventually send manned missions beyond the moon. It currently costs about $5,000 per kilogram (2.2 pounds) to ship water in a space shuttle.

NASA's Web site notes that the station crew depends now on water carried up aboard a space shuttle or cargo rocket. But an operational water recycler is expected to cut that need by 65 percent by producing about 6,000 pounds (2,722 kilograms) of potable water each year.

(Images of astronaut and mission specialist Donald Pettit installing and configuring the Water Recovery System (WRS) rack in the ISS's Destiny laboratory are courtesy of NASA)

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe