Spacecraft turns to Earth to see what habitability looks like from afar

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To find out what water might look like on alien worlds, a group of researchers decided to see how Earth's oceans would appear from afar, as if from another planet.

Using the Deep Impact/EPOXI spacecraft, currently headed for a rendezvous next year with Comet Hartley 2, they peered back at Earth from more than 30 million miles (50 million kilometers) away, tracking the way reflected light changes as oceans rotate in and out of view.

From that distance, Earth's surface features were blurred [see photo at left], but the presence of water passing through the spacecraft's view increased the planet's blueness. Landmasses, on the other hand, lent a reddish hue. The team of researchers was able to assemble from those color variations a rough map of the liquid and land boundaries on Earth, presented in a paper set to be published in the Astrophysical Journal.

Such investigations may soon become useful, as the race is on to find potentially habitable planets outside of the solar system. NASA's Kepler spacecraft last month began its search for such extrasolar planets, scanning a patch of sky in the hopes of turning up Earth-like worlds that could sustain water oceans.

At the moment, astronomers are not able to image extrasolar planets with anything near the resolution enjoyed by the study's authors. (The spacecraft, which photographed Earth from approximately the vantage point of Venus at its closest to Earth, was far closer than any exoplanet.) But the researchers say such an analysis is not merely science fiction. Lead author Nicolas Cowan, a graduate student in astronomy at the University of Washington, said in a statement that the research was carried out "as if we were aliens looking at Earth with the tools we might have in 10 years."

One notable limitation of the new technique, which would likely also apply to a similar approach proposed in April to track a rotating planet's mirrorlike reflectance, is a dependence on the distribution of water on the planet. "We could erroneously see the planet as a desert world if it had a nearly solid band of continents around its equator and oceans at its poles," Cowan said in a separate statement.

Earth and the moon, as photographed by Deep Impact/EPOXI last year from a distance of 30 million miles (50 million kilometers), courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech/UMD/GSFC

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe