The biggest loser: Buying weight loss

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Seems money trumps health when it comes to losing weight. A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association today found that people were more likely to stick to weight-loss programs if they were offered cash incentives. And what about the reward of being thinner and healthier, of dropping pounds to lower one's risk of high blood pressure, stroke, heart attack and a slew of other obesity-related ails? Didn't hold a candle to the money prize, according to researchers.

Approximately 200 million Americans (two thirds of the population) are fat. That is to say, they are overweight or obese, according to standard body mass index criteria. Worldwide, obesity has become even more prevalent than hunger, and the trend shows no signs of reversing.


But scientists found that the need for instant gratification that may drive obesity may also be harnessed to fight it.  Specifically, they assigned 57 participants the same weight loss goal of 16 pounds in 16 weeks and discovered that those offered cash incentives (no more than $100) along the way dropped an average of four pounds more than those who weren't paid for pounds.

But as Oprah well knows, losing weight is one thing, but keeping it off is another. Seven months after the study concluded, the subjects tended to regain some of the weight they had lost whether or not they received cash prizes.  This demonstrates that the strategy might be best suited for short-term as opposed to long-term weight loss objectives. 

"For better or worse, we [humans] put a disproportionate emphasis on immediate gratification," says lead author Kevin Volpp, Associate Professor of Medicine and Health Care Management at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and the Wharton School. Human nature is tough to change; accepting this reality and using money to entice people toward healthier behaviors may not be such a bad idea, he contends.

Insurance companies and employers might be wise to consider using financial incentives to encourage and reinforce more healthy behaviors, he adds. Some businesses already have such reward systems in place, offering bonuses to employees who regularly work out, for instance, but Volpp says more should follow suit.

Image Credit ©iStockphoto.com/Luis Pedrosa

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe