Vitamin D deficiency ups risk of C-section deliveries, study says

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pregnant women with vitamin D deficiencies are more likely than other expectant moms to deliver their babies via cesarean section.

"Women with a vitamin D deficiency were almost 4 times more likely to have a cesarean than those with [normal] vitamin D levels," says senior study author Anne Merewood, an assistant pediatrics professor at Boston University School of Medicine. "Vitamin D is definitely involved in muscle strength…. contractions of the uterus [which is made of smooth muscle] may not be performing as well as they could be," making it difficult for the woman to help push the baby out herself.

This research was actually part of a larger study (the findings of which are yet to be published) of the prevalence of vitamin D deficiencies among women of childbearing age. Merewood told ScientificAmerican.com that 156 (36 percent) of the 433 women in the larger study were found to be vitamin D deficient and 100 (23 percent) severely deficient. This translates into a potentially major public health problem, as vitamin D deficiency was recently linked to a number of chronic diseases, including cancer and multiple sclerosis.

Merewood's advice to pregnant women: Be careful in the sun but be sure to get some exposure since its rays help produce vitamin D in the body. She says that women should consider drinking vitamin D-fortified milk, taking vitamin D supplements and, for those at high risk (women with minimal sun exposure or dark-skinned women living at high latitudes) asking their docs for blood tests to make sure they're not deficient in the bone and muscle-building vitamin. 

But no need to panic, says Daniel Hirsch, an assistant pediatrics prof at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in Somerville, N.J.

"There could be multiple reasons that are combining to explain why they happened to find an association between  . . . C-sections and vitamin D deficiency," he says. "Maybe the moms who had lower [vitamin] D levels happened to be delivered by OBs [obstetrician-gynecologists] who themselves are more likely to section a woman." Hirsh says that more large-scale studies with are needed to verify this apparent link between vitamin D deficiency and C-sections.

In this study, researchers tested the vitamin D levels of healthy pregnant women within 72 hours of delivering; 43 (17 percent) of them had first-time C-sections (those with prior C-sections were eliminated from the study, because they are more likely to have repeat such deliveries).

Image credit ©iStockphoto.com/hidesy

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe