Were anti-climate bill letters penciled in coal?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A coal industry advocacy group has acknowledged that a contractor it hired later subcontracted a D.C.-based lobbying firm that then fired off a dozen falsified letters to congressional offices, pressuring a "nay" vote on a climate bill, The New York Times reported this week. The forged notes—designed to appear as if written by members of nonprofit groups—arrived before votes were cast on major clean energy legislation; the House narrowly approved the bill on June 26.

Bonner & Associates
, hired by a contractor for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE), fabricated names of supposed members of the NAACP and Cresciendo Juntos, a Hispanic community group, and made them the "authors" of the would-be grassroots letters, according to the newspaper.

"They stole our name. They stole our logo. They created a position title and made up the name of someone to fill it," Tim Freilich, an executive committee member for Cresciendo Juntos, told Climate Progress, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund (CAPAF).

ACCCE President and CEO Stephen L. Miller said in a prepared statement Monday that the organization apologized for the "deception" and was "outraged" at the conduct of the lobbying firm. 

"Bonner and Associates was hired by the Hawthorn Group—our primary grassroots contractor—to do limited outreach earlier this year on H.R. 2454. Based upon the information we have, it is clear that an employee of Bonner’s firm failed to demonstrate the integrity we demand of all our contractors and subcontractors. As a result, these egregious actions led to falsified letters being sent to Members of Congress," Miller said.

One of the bill's sponsors, Rep. Ed Markey (D–Mass.), is demanding more answers from the ACCCE, which was informed about the fake letters two days before the vote, according to the Associated Press.

Miller noted in his statement that the ACCCE is "evaluating all possible measures—including potential legal action." Meanwhile, Bonner & Associates has fired a temporary employee who is being held responsible for the letters.

This wouldn't be the first time the lobbying firm used what are now called "astroturf tactics." A 2002 Baltimore Sun article reported that "after the group was hired by PhRMA to kill Maryland legislation that would have affected prescription drug legislation, they faxed dozens of community leaders with a petition that was meant to appear grassroots, 'including grammatical errors and a handwritten cover letter.'" The Sun article is noted at the Web site of Think Progress, also a project of the CAPAF.

The latest anti–climate bill letters, including one written by a fictional T. J. Hudson of the NAACP, are at least a grammatical improvement, if not a moral one—just a few missing commas here and there.

Picture by DNY59 via iStockphoto

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe