Serotonin-Deprived Cleaner Fish Are Socially Withdrawn

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


You might have heard of serotonin as one of the ‘happy’ hormones in humans. Indeed, mood disorders like anxiety and depression are associated with low levels of serotonin. However, this neurotransmitter also has other functions. One of the more interesting ones in humans is its role in cooperation. Lowering the serotonin levels of people increases peoples’ reactions to unfairness and makes them less cooperative. On the other hand, increasing the level of serotonin in people makes people less argumentative and more communicative and cooperative. Serotonin also plays a role in peoples’ intimate relationships, for example men and women who were fed tryptophan (necessary for serotonin production) were more likely to judge photos of couples as intimate and romantic than people who had not been fed tryptophan.

Humans are of course not the only animals that form intimate relationships or cooperate with each other. One of the best examples of unrelated animals cooperating comes from cleaner fish, who form relationships with ‘clients’ (visiting reef fish) where they clean their bodies, gills and even mouths. This relationship is very cooperative: the cleaner fish would rather eat the mucus from the skin of their clients than the ectoparasites (it’s yummier, apparently), but they usually keep this particular urge under control. In return, the clients don’t eat the cleaner fish, even when they are cleaning the inside of their mouths and one might think that it would be pretty tempting just to swallow one. Of course, cleaner fish do ‘cheat’ occasionally, taking a bite from the skin of a client, making the client jolt away and probably choose not to return to that particular cleaner again.

An overly cheerful video of a cleaner fish at work:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If cleaning alone weren’t enough to foster this cooperative relationship, cleaner fish also provide tactile stimulation to their clients, rubbing their pelvic fins on the dorsal area of the client (kind of like a massage). As this is about as cooperative and intimate as two animals that aren’t courting can get, it seems like the perfect scenario for a possible role for serotonin.

José Paula and colleagues recently carried out an experiment looking into this. They caught 45 cleaner wrasse from around Lizard Island in Australia and injected them with one of five possible compounds. Two of these compounds enhance the effects of serotonin, two of them block the effects of serotonin and one was a saline solution (to act as a control). They then recorded the behaviour of these cleaner fish when interacting with their clients.

So what happened to these serotonin-enhanced or deprived fish? Those that now had more serotonin became much more social, seeking out clients to clean in what was (in my mind) a happy and well-adjusted manner. On the other hand, the poor fish now lacking serotonin became antisocial, avoiding taking new clients. Who knows what kinds of paranoid thoughts might be going through the serotonin-deprived cleaner’s minds, but perhaps some form of cleaning performance anxiety. 

References

Bilderbeck et al. (2011). Serotonergic activity influences the cognitive appraisal of close intimate relationships in healthy adults. Biol Psychiatry. 69:720–725.

Paula, J. R., Messias, J. P., Grutter, A. S., Bshary, R., & Soares, M. C. (2015). The role of serotonin in the modulation of cooperative behavior. Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arv039.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe