17th-century Brueghel paintings trace the early, mysterious history of the telescope

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Thanks to the much-heralded International Year of Astronomy, this much we know: Galileo used a telescope to observe the moon in 1609. But the inventor of the revolutionary resolutionary device remains unknown, and its early history is muddied by simultaneous discoveries and competing claims.

In a paper posted to the online repository arXiv.org in August, a pair of researchers from the Astronomical Observatory of Trieste in Italy argues that a partial record of telescopic history resides in the works of Jan Brueghel the Elder. Brueghel, a Flemish painter who lived from 1568 to 1625, came from a family of artists: his father and older brother, both named Pieter Brueghel, were famous painters, and his son Jan Brueghel the Younger also attained some renown for his art.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One of Brueghel's paintings, according to study authors Paolo Molaro and Pierluigi Selvelli, contains the first known depiction of a telescope. In Extensive Landscape with View of the Castle of Mariemont, circa 1608–1611, Archduke Albert VII of Hapsburg holds a spyglass of the kind Galileo famously trained on the moon 400 years ago this fall. (Brueghel was Albert's court painter.) What is more, Molaro and Selvelli argue, letters and documents from the 17th century suggest that the archduke obtained telescopes from their as-yet-unidentified inventor.

Historical records indicate that Albert received early spyglasses from two Dutch telescope pioneers, Zacharias Janssen and Hans Lipperhey, the latter of whom unsuccessfully attempted to patent the device. Either could have been the original inventor of the device, and a 1611 letter from an Italian nobleman to Galileo informs the famous astronomer that the archduke owned telescopes built by the "primo inventore."

In a 1617 Brueghel, The Allegory of Sight, a work made with the painter's sometime collaborator Peter Paul Rubens, a more sophisticated telescope appears on an adjustable mount. Several indicators—the instrument's length, its large eyepiece, and a narrowing of the tube near the eyepiece—hint that it was a Keplerian model, named for Johannes Kepler, the German astronomer and contemporary of Brueghel. Keplerian telescopes used a pair of convex lenses to magnify distant objects, permitting a wider field of view than the early spyglasses of Galileo, Lipperhey and others, which had a concave lens at the eyepiece.

Such a design had been described in principle by Kepler in 1611, Molaro and Selvelli note, but a published description of an actualized Keplerian scope did not appear until 1631. But once again the historical record provides a possible explanation to fill out the hints provided by Brueghel: A German Jesuit priest named Christoph Scheiner wrote in 1631 that he had built a Keplerian telescope as early as 1614 and had shown it to Archduke Maximilian III, the brother of Brueghel's patron, Archduke Albert VII.

Detail of The Allegory of Sight: Wikimedia Commons

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe