Background noise: Elderly drivers might have a brain region to blame for declining driving skills

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Debate about older adults' driving skills often touches on obvious impairments, such as failing vision and heavy medication use. But a new study suggests a deeper neurological explanation for why seniors have a hard time spotting obvious objects on the road: They might actually just be better at perceiving large-scale movement in the background, an ability that could compete with attention paid to smaller objects in the foreground.

"The amount of visual information around us is huge, and we don't have the brain power to process it all," Duje Tadin, of University of Rochester's Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, said in a prepared statement. So, to prioritize, the brain uses "spatial suppression" to filter out what it deems less relevant visual information, which is often that coming from the background.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tadin and his colleagues hypothesized that this spatial suppression was being mediated at least in part by the middle temporal visual area and so by turning down this area's function—as might happen in older adults—they could also reduce spatial suppression. The results were published online January 25 in The Journal of Neuroscience.

The research team used transcranial magnetic stimulation to send mild electrical current to the middle temporal visual area of the cortex. After 15 minutes of the 1 Hz stimulation to the noggins of six young healthy volunteers, the researchers found that the subjects were much more attuned to broader movements in the background than they had previously been. "Disruption of [the middle temporal visual area] improved motion discrimination of large, moving stimuli," the researchers wrote in their paper.

The tamping down of the middle temporal visual area did not, however, seem to affect perception of small foreground objects' movement. Thus, with the brain receiving even more visual data, it might become less efficient at focusing on the important stuff—such as a person dashing across the road. 

The findings also might have implications for populations other than the elderly, including people with schizophrenia or depression. "These paradoxical results mimic special population findings," the researchers noted. "Particularly patients with a history of depression who exhibit better-than-normal motion perception of large patterns coupled with normal perception of small, moving stimuli." By better understanding what parts of the brain might be contributing to altered visual processing, researchers might some day be able to develop improved disease models and possibly even treatments. 

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/CWImages

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe