Balls rolling uphill (or so it would appear) win Best Illusion of the Year honors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


To construct the deceptive contraption he would enter in an international illusion contest, Kokichi Sugihara contravened a deeply held intuition: gravity works. Sugihara, a mathematical engineer at Meiji University in Japan, built a set of four ramps, arranged in a cross, on which wooden balls appear to roll uphill, as if pulled by a magnet toward the center.

We won't give away the secret (revealed in the video below), but suffice it to say that Sugihara's illusion was clever enough to win the 2010 Best Illusion of the Year contest, held May 10 at the Philharmonic Center for the Arts in Naples, Fla. (Scientific American co-sponsored the event.) The contest, now in its sixth year, is an offshoot of the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, which was being held at a nearby hotel.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A panel of judges whittled the submissions, all of which had to be new or at least unpublished before 2009, to 10 finalists; attendees of the contest gala then voted to determine the best illusions of that group. Rounding out the top three were entries by vision scientist Bart Anderson of the University of Sydney and physiologist Jan Kremlacek of Charles University in Prague.

For more trickery, see our recent slide show of visual illusions.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe