Can Shrinking Cities Regrow as Farms? [Video]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While much of the rest of the world undergoes an incredible surge in urbanization, certain cities in the U.S. continue to shrink in population, and thus geography. The leader of that pack, as it were, is Detroit.

This is nothing new, of course. Rome went from imperial capital to grazing land for shepherds and back again to become what is now the capital of modern Italy. Detroit may well rebound.

But, for the moment, Motor City faces the question of what to do with its roughly 70,000 dilapidated buildings—a number that grows each year—that need to be torn down and its approximately 100 square kilometers of already abandoned land. The answer may be to farm it, according to this video from PBS's Need to Know.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Watch the full episode. See more Need To Know.

Obviously, this idea is in no way limited to Detroit. Urban farms are a growing interest even in cities that aren't shrinking, such as New York. But in a case like Detroit, urban farming may help to fill in sprawling gaps that otherwise present a host of challenges—from policing to property values. In fact, one of the proposed farms would be roughly half the size of New York's Central Park.

Made in Detroit might soon be replaced by Grown in Detroit.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe