Can You Explain Climate to an 11-Year-Old?

Seven scientists did it well enough to become finalists in an international competition

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Last December, in a conversation on NPR’s Science Friday, Alan Alda introduced the 2018 Flame Challenge question, “What is Climate?” and charged scientists to tackle it in a way clear and engaging enough for an 11-year-old to understand. Scientists from all over took the challenge, from across the U.S. and as far away as Austria, Libya, and India.

Each year The Flame Challenge poses a new question submitted by 11-year-olds, and holds an international competition for scientists to communicate their answer in written, video, or graphic form. All entries are sent off to schools where thousands of fifth- and sixth-graders serve as judges, reviewing the entries and discussing them in their classes.

They score each entry not just on how clear it was or how much they learned, but also on whether it held their interest; if it engaged them; and if it was relatable to them as 11-year-olds. It’s not easy to do!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Now the reviews have been tallied, and the student judges have spoken: The Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science is thrilled to announce the Finalists for the 2018 Flame Challenge!

The seven winning entries were submitted by scientists from several fields, and managed to cover not only the basics of climate itself, but also the problem of climate change. In fact, nearly all the entries this year found a way to connect what climate is to how climate changes, impressing its importance and empowering kids to be a part of changing it for the better. In some of the judges’ words:

“When I read long, all-information no explanation articles, I don't take anything away. With this, I could remember almost every reference and fact,” gushed one student about a video entry.

“I learned so much,” another commented, this time about a written entry, “It made me feel like I need to do something to help the earth.”

About a graphic entry one student remarked, “It’s great when they include examples from real life, ones I can relate to!”

The Flame Challenge Finalists now head back to the all the schools so the judges can vote on their favorite in each of the categories. The winners of this global student vote will be featured in The Flame Challenge show at the 2018 World Science Festival. It will be an exciting and dynamic program, hosted by Alan Alda himself, where you’ll learn about climate and weather, the extremities of both—and of course about the winners. Sign up for the WSF Newsletter and you’ll get notified when tickets for this year’s show!

Learn more about the 2018 Flame Challenge Finalists

Sign up for the World Science Festival newsletter

About Nancee Moes

Nancy Moes, MFA, is the coordinator of the 2018 Flame Challenge and an Improvisation Instructor for the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science where she teaches undergraduate science students, pushing them to develop skills in presence, audience connection, and personal investment. She also serves on the Alda Improv Team where she works developing both undergraduate and graduate curricula,

More by Nancee Moes

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe