Could ocean acidification deafen dolphins?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As more and more carbon dioxide enters the Earth's atmosphere, oceans are becoming more acidic. In fact, this acidification has been blamed for everything from killing off coral to aiding algae and even super-sizing fish ear bones. But the changing marine chemistry may also be altering the deep sea's acoustic environment, according to a new paper, published online Sunday in Nature Geoscience reports (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group), making it much noisier for the animals that depend on sound to navigate the watery depths. 

"At present, the most debated negative effect of ocean acidification is reduced calcification rates," the researchers, led by Tatiana Ilyina of the School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu, wrote. "However, a less anticipated consequence of ocean acidification is its effect on underwater sound absorption."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As ocean water becomes more acidic—thanks in large part to human-generated carbon dioxide—concentrations of sound-absorbing chemicals (such as magnesium sulphate and boric acid) drop, which means noise, especially low-frequency rumbles (up to 5,000 hertz), travels farther.

Using models of carbon dioxide output and the world's oceans, the researchers found that sound absorption could fall by some 60 percent in high latitudes and deep waters within the next three centuries. Add to that more low-frequency noise from human ocean activity, such as construction, shipping and sonar, and you get a veritable cacophony for many deep-sea denizens.

"We predict that over the twenty-first century, chemical absorption of sound in this frequency range [100 to 10 hertz] will nearly halve in some regions that experience significant radiated noise from industrial activity," the authors conclude. 

Some low-frequency din is caused naturally by waves and rain on the ocean's surface—as well as by animals themselves. But, the authors noted, "high levels of low-frequency sound have a number of behavioral and biological effects on marine life, including tissue damage, mass stranding of cetaceans and temporary loss of hearing in dolphins."

Certainly, increased sound travel could actually aid some animals' aural acuity, sending whale communication farther than it travels now. There is evidence that, "marine species have adapted to varying levels of noise," the authors noted, but "the consequences of increasing long-range sound transmission in the frequencies that are important for many marine mammals are unknown."

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/PeeBee23

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe