CVS Anti-Tobacco Move Possible Boon for Electronic Cigarettes?

When retail giant CVS Caremark unveiled its announcement this morning that it will no longer sell cigarettes or other tobacco products in its stores it was rightly hailed as a boon for public health, even netting public praise and a thank you – from the White House.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When retail giant CVS Caremark unveiled its announcement this morning that it will no longer sell cigarettes or other tobacco products in its stores it was rightly hailed as a boon for public health, even netting public praise – and a thank you - from the White House. But even as CVS said its decision was spurred by its efforts to provide health care to its consumers, the decision also raises questions about the future of traditional smokes’ tobacco-free cousin, electronic cigarettes.

Although CVS does not currently sell electronic cigarettes in its stores, its decision today has fueled speculation that it may sell the products in its more than 7,600 CVS/pharmacy stores in the future. CVS told Scientific American in an email, “We are monitoring what the FDA decides in regard to them,” a reference to the agency's ongoing considerations about how to regulate the popular tobacco alternative. CVS plans to stop selling conventional tobacco products in its stores by October 1, 2014.

Meant to simulate the act of smoking through vaporizing a nicotine-laced solution into an aerosol mist, e-cigarettes have been gaining in popularity in recent years but have also come under fire for attracting youth users. The devices are not currently regulated as tobacco products or subject to the same restrictions that tobacco companies operate under. For example, an advertisement from an e-cigarette company aired in some communities during this year’s Super Bowl when such ads for conventional cigarettes have been banned for decades. Indeed, the science around electronic cigarettes continues to be divisive and its long-term impacts remain unknown.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: FDA

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe