CVS Anti-Tobacco Move Possible Boon for Electronic Cigarettes?

When retail giant CVS Caremark unveiled its announcement this morning that it will no longer sell cigarettes or other tobacco products in its stores it was rightly hailed as a boon for public health, even netting public praise and a thank you – from the White House.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When retail giant CVS Caremark unveiled its announcement this morning that it will no longer sell cigarettes or other tobacco products in its stores it was rightly hailed as a boon for public health, even netting public praise – and a thank you - from the White House. But even as CVS said its decision was spurred by its efforts to provide health care to its consumers, the decision also raises questions about the future of traditional smokes’ tobacco-free cousin, electronic cigarettes.

Although CVS does not currently sell electronic cigarettes in its stores, its decision today has fueled speculation that it may sell the products in its more than 7,600 CVS/pharmacy stores in the future. CVS told Scientific American in an email, “We are monitoring what the FDA decides in regard to them,” a reference to the agency's ongoing considerations about how to regulate the popular tobacco alternative. CVS plans to stop selling conventional tobacco products in its stores by October 1, 2014.

Meant to simulate the act of smoking through vaporizing a nicotine-laced solution into an aerosol mist, e-cigarettes have been gaining in popularity in recent years but have also come under fire for attracting youth users. The devices are not currently regulated as tobacco products or subject to the same restrictions that tobacco companies operate under. For example, an advertisement from an e-cigarette company aired in some communities during this year’s Super Bowl when such ads for conventional cigarettes have been banned for decades. Indeed, the science around electronic cigarettes continues to be divisive and its long-term impacts remain unknown.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: FDA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe