Dana Vollmer's Butterfly Stroke Features Dolphinlike Moves [Video]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


U.S. swimmer Dana Vollmer's record-setting performance in London in the 100-meter butterfly is sure to be a model for aspiring Olympians. Vollmer's edge in butterfly competition comes from her uncanny ability to closely mimic the underwater undulation and kick of nature's greatest swimmer—the dolphin.

The 24-year-old Syracuse, N.Y., native worked with a team of motion-capture video specialists from New York University (N.Y.U.) prior to the 2012 Olympic Games to analyze her kick, grab and recovery as she cuts through the water and found the similarities striking. N.Y.U. computer scientist Chris Bregler and his team applied black-and-white markers to Vollmer's body so their AquaCap underwater motion-capture system could gather three-dimensional data that would allow them to digitally reconstruct her stroke and compare it with that of a dolphin (see video below).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At N.Y.U.'s Movement Lab Bregler has been using motion-capture technology to help law enforcement, professional athletes and entertainers study a wide variety of movement. Subjects have included New York Yankees baseball pitcher Mariano Rivera and New York Philharmonic's conductor Alan Gilbert.

Vollmer's waterproof black-and-white markers—somewhat similar to decals that carmakers place on crash-test dummies to track their movement upon impact—provided stark contrast that was easier for the camera to pick up. "These patterns can be used to track with high accuracy in high-speed cameras the center of the patch, even if its motion is blurred," Bregler says.

Typically, motion-capture relies on reflective bulb-like markers placed at various locations on a special motion-capture suit. This was a less appealing option when trying to visualize a streamlined swimming stroke in a pool, where other reflections are already abundant.

As Scientific American learned last year, light reflected from these markers is picked up by an array of cameras capturing video of the motion-capture subject from a variety of different angles. Software gathers the data collected from the reflectors and maps the location of each marker on a computer screen.

For additional analysis of the Olympic Games and how science comes into play, check out Scientific American's eBook The Science of Sports: Winning in the Olympics.

Images courtesy of N.Y.U./Manhattan Mocap LLC

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe