Disease-Causing Compound Found in Air Clogged with Smoke from Cigarettes, Fires or Air Pollution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Inhaling cigarette smoke or smoggy air is clearly not great for your health. And exposure to various kinds of smoke has been associated with cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis and cataracts.

Researchers have now pinpointed a compound common in disparate forms of smoke that might explain some of the frequent ills associated with it. The findings are described in a new paper published online May 16 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We found isocyanic acid in a number of places, from air in downtown Los Angeles and air downwind of a Colorado wildfire, to cigarette smoke," Jim Roberts, a chemist at NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory and co-author of the new study, said in a prepared statement. Isocyanic acid—abbreviated as HNCO—is a substance known to act in the body along disease-related pathways through a process known as protein carbamylation.

Although the new study did not look specifically at how ambient HNCO might be affecting people's health, the researchers note that it makes sense that it would have easy access into the human body's innards. "It dissolves readily in water, which means that humans can be exposed directly if it gets into eyes or lungs," Roberts said.

This is the first time that HNCO had been measured in ambient air, the researchers report. To get specific readings, the team used a negative-ion proton-transfer chemical ionization mass spectrometer.

Roberts and his colleagues measured high concentrations of the compound in the air in Boulder, Colo., during last year's Fourmile Canyon fire and in the smoggy city of Los Angeles, finding that both had about 200 parts per billion HNCO. Previous findings have indicated that levels higher than one part per billion in the ambient air might have negative impacts on human health. The high levels in L.A. are likely an unintended consequence of efforts to curb nitrogen emissions from diesel trucks. These so-called urea-selective catalytic reduction systems scrub out nitrogen but create HNCO as a byproduct, the researchers report.

In addition to these significant concerns for people living here in the U.S., the risks might be greater for the many people in the developing world who use open-fire stoves, or cook stoves. A lab test of burning biomass produced concentrations of 600 parts per billion when measured close to the flames. "There are literally billions of people in the world who burn biomass for cooking and heating," Roberts said. "If these indoor fires release similar levels of isocyanic acid as the fires we studied in the laboratories, families could be exposed to high levels of the chemical."

The team underscored the need for further research into how HNCO might be affecting human health—especially with the prevalence of biomass-based stoves and the prediction for more wild fires due to climate change. "We may be facing a future of higher amounts of HNCO in the atmosphere," Roberts said. And although that might be bad news for human health, Roberts noted that at least "it is fortunate that now we can measure it."

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/plherrera

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe