Farmers Deplete Fossil Water in World's Breadbaskets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Irrigation has helped farmers feed a population that has now reached 7 billion people. But in many places farmers have overused underground aquifers that have taken thousands of years to form, drawing down the fossil water much faster than it can be replaced. The Ogallala aquifer in the American high plains, along with similar aquifers in Mexico, Eastern Europe, Egypt, Arabia, Iran, India and China, represent the crisis zones for humanity's groundwater footprint, according to a new analysis published in Nature on August 9. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.) Here's what the world's groundwater footprint looks like:

View a Larger Version of the Map

As shown, the "footprint" (gray) represents how much water people are drawing from the aquifer, compared with how much the aquifer actually holds (in red, orange or yellow, depending on how bad the water imbalance is). The imbalance exists because these aquifers support agricultural zones much larger than their physical extent. These areas also happen to be some of the most vitally important agricultural regions of the world. In fact, 1.7 billion people in these regions rely on these waters directly—each and every one of them facing a looming water crisis. And in times when the rains fail—such as is occurring now throughout the Ogallala aquifer region in the U.S.—such fossil water is the only hope to keep crops from failing too.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The problem with drawing too much water from an aquifer, which has been stored in these geologic formations for thousands of years, is that it can't easily be restored once pumped dry. That's the crisis facing farmers who rely on the Ogallala Aquifer, which once contained enough water to cover the entire continental U.S. roughly half-a-meter deep. Once pumped dry, the Ogallala would take at least 6,000 years to refill.

Another complication of pumping too much water from an aquifer is that creeks will run dry and surface waters can literally be sucked back underneath the surface. That's not good for wildlife. Yet the world needs more water to meet the demand of a growing population for food.

As the map shows, however, the world actually has vast reserves of fossil water in places like Siberia and throughout Africa and South America. And then there are the easily rechargeable aquifers like the Floridan Aquifer in the southeastern U.S. or the lower portion of the Ganges River in India. These aquifers can be drawn down and then recharged by a good storm or monsoon.

So the question confronting us as we struggle to adapt to this new age of man, or Anthropocene, is whether we can learn to sustainably manage these groundwater resources. Or whether we'll pump them dry and then have to wait for the fickle rains of a changed climate to sustain us.

Image: Gleeson et al. / Nature

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe