First Prehistoric Snake Slithered Out on Land-Not at Sea

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Sorry, sea serpents. Snakes, it seems, slithered off their lizard legs on land. A new analysis of a primitive snake fossil suggests that these animals emerged from a line of burrowing reptiles.

Snakes are in the same reptilian order that includes lizards, but just how and where they split off to live their legless lives has been a bit of a mystery. Transitional fossils showing the move from four-legged lizard to belly-crawling snake have remained scarce. However, that the jawbones of a Cretaceous snake from North America suggest that it might be the earliest snake on record. And this serpent was terrestrial, clearing up decades of debate about whether snakes evolved for swimming or slithering, researchers reported online July 25 in Nature (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).

The first known example of the snake in question, Coniophis precedens, was collected in eastern Wyoming and described from a single vertebra in 1892. In the 120 years since, additional vertebrae and jaw bones from the species " have been collected but never described," wrote the researchers, led by Nicholas Longrich, of Yale University's geology and geophysics department. Their analysis shows that the 70 million-year-old specimen is probably the most primitive known snake—and a sister line to the nearly 3,000 snake species that exist today.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The early snake had slightly hooked teeth and a relatively flexible jaw joint, but much of the overall shape was still similar to a lizard. Its long slender body measured about 70 centimeters from snout to the base of its tail. In sum, it combined "a snake-like body with a lizard-like head," the researchers noted, which could have provided advantages for burrowing—and eating. (There are some legless lizards, but they have a slightly different skeletal structure and other distinctive lizard features.) Earlier research suggested that the first snakes might have been best adapted to feed on insects and other invertebrates. But the teeth and jaws of C. precedens suggests that it was "suited to piercing and holding soft-bodied prey," specifically small vertebrates.

This proto-snake likely lived in a floodplain area and "lacks adaptations for aquatic locomotion," the researchers noted. Instead, its vertebrae and the shape of its jaw suggest a life accustomed to burrowing, with time spent aboveground hunting for prey. Even ancient sea-faring snakes such as Simoliophiidae likely evolved from lines similar to this early landlubber.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe