Get Your Iceberg Water, Here

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


There's something about the idea of towing an iceberg from sea to sea that appeals to one's inner mad scientist (or rather, mad engineer). Most recently, entrepreneur Georges Mougin made news by backing up such a plan—to transport icebergs to drought-stricken regions as a source of freshwater—with digital technology.

A team of engineers from software company Dassault Systemes created a computer simulation for Mougin. According to their results, a tugboat could take a seven-million-ton berg, wrapped in an insulating skirt, from Newfoundland, Canada, to the Canary Islands, which currently use desalinization to deal with their periodic water shortages, for about $9.8 million. The 5,500-kilometer journey, during which the iceberg would lose about 38 percent of its mass, would last four to five months.

Although the computer simulation shows how it would be possible to transport an iceberg without it melting away entirely, Mougin's plan is not the most financially accessible solution for relieving drought in areas such as Texas or Somalia: After the mass loss, his simulation produces 4.3 million tons of iceberg at a cost of almost $10 million, which comes to about 23 percent of a single cent per liter. This may sound low, but compare it to the common method of desalinizing seawater, which yields a liter of freshwater for nine percent of a cent.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Desalinized seawater costs less than half as much as melted iceberg water, and the price continues to drop as research uncovers new techniques for desalination. One method under development drags the cost of a liter of potable water down to 4.6 percent of a cent.

These new numbers do prove that the price of iceberg hauling may be lower than Iceberg Transport International, a company that Mougin and Saudi prince Mohammed al Faisal founded in 1975, originally estimated. At the 1977 International Conference on Iceberg Utilization, held in landlocked Ames, Iowa, the company suggested a more ambitious arrangement than the modern plan: using multiple tugboats to drag an Antarctic berg of 100 million tons, insulated in sailcloth and plastic, to the Arabian Peninsula. At the time, their estimates suggested the 11,500-kilometer journey would cost $100 million. Given the size of the target iceberg, that price in modern dollars would have yielded water for about 38 percent of a cent per liter, after adjusting for inflation. Iceberg Transport International suggested that the method would be cost effective compared to the price of desalinization, as long as the iceberg only lost 20 percent of its mass on the way to Saudi Arabia. (Since then, desalinization technology has improved in technique and cost.)

At the time, however, other scientists at the conference raised serious criticisms. Some thought the berg would melt away entirely near the equator, or that its presence in the dry Middle East would cause unpredictable environmental problems. Although Mougin's simulation disproves the idea that the iceberg would entirely melt, and the FAQ on Dassault Systemes's web site pooh-poohs the idea that a small iceberg in a big sea would have much environmental impact, it's crystal clear: Iceberg hauling is romantic, but it's not the most cost-effective solution for water shortages.

Furthermore, the simulation did not seem to estimate the carbon footprint that a 5,500-kilometer journey would leave via a tugboat transport run on diesel. Water desalinization can occur closer to the drought area, thus requiring less transportation.

Despite the flaws in his method, Mougin has suggested a real-life project to push around a 30-million-ton iceberg. Presumably, a larger berg would require even larger bills due to additional fuel costs and impacts. In addition, a berg four times heavier than the one in the simulation may have a different melting rate.

The media coverage notwithstanding, the current iceberg-towing plan will not bring bergs any closer to easing the drought in impoverished Somalia without a wealthy benefactor's involvement. If the Texan drought, however, becomes too much for a generous oil millionaire, Mougin's suggestion might be plausible. Maybe the philanthropist could order some iceberg ice for a party, like Faisal did back in 1977. At the conference, he had a mini-berg shipped from Alaska to Ames via helicopter, plane and truck. For the price tag of $5,000, an austere symbol of nature's majesty was chipped off the old block to float atop cool drinks in Iowa.

Image credit: David Demer, NOAA/NMFS/SWFSC/AMLR

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe