Giant Radio Telescope in W. Virginia Scans Newfound Planets for Signs of Intelligent Life

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The search for alien civilizations is returning to its roots. In the latest chapter of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, or SETI, researchers are using the Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia to check out some of the distant worlds being discovered in droves by NASA's Kepler spacecraft. Green Bank is where SETI began in earnest more than 50 years ago with a campaign called Project Ozma, led by astronomer Frank Drake.

Some of the Kepler planets appear to orbit at a nice, temperate, potentially life-enabling distance from their host stars, making them especially attractive targets for SETI searches. Most of the Kepler worlds have yet to be confirmed at other observatories, but that has not stopped SETI searchers from scanning them for signs of intelligent life, specifically radio waves.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The most recent West Virginia–based search began May 7 when the 100-meter Green Bank Telescope, the largest steerable radio dish in the world, spent an hour eavesdropping on the field of stars Kepler is observing. According to a University of California, Berkeley, press release, the campaign has been allotted 24 hours of observing time to target 86 of the more than 1,200 planetary candidates Kepler has located.

The researchers, led by U.C. Berkeley graduate student Andrew Siemion, selected the planets in Kepler's catalogue that seem most likely to be hospitable to life as we know it. "We've picked out the planets with nice temperatures—between zero and 100 degrees Celsius—because they are a lot more likely to harbor life," U.C. Berkeley physicist Dan Werthimer said in a prepared statement. Werthimer is chief scientist for the distributed computing project SETI@home, which uses volunteers' idle computing time to sift through data from radio telescopes such as Arecibo in Puerto Rico for possible SETI signals, and which will be enlisted to help process the Green Bank data.

SETI researchers are trying to raise funds for a similar but more sustained Kepler follow-up using the Allen Telescope Array, an interconnected network of smaller radio dishes in northern California. That telescope array went dormant in April when the nonprofit SETI Institute and U.C. Berkeley ran out of money to operate it.

Green Bank Telescope photo courtesy of NRAO/AUI

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe