How to excavate a human burial: Lessons from a dinosaur expert

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


SACRAMENTO—It is one of the most poignant scenes ever captured in the human fossil record—a woman and two children buried together some 5,300 years ago on a bed of flowers, holding hands. They lived by the shores of a shallow freshwater lake in what is now Niger, at a time when the Sahara was green. A team led by famed dinosaur hunter Paul Sereno of the University of Chicago discovered this burial and hundreds of others at a site called Gobero in the Ténéré Desert, which is part of the Sahara. On April 1, Sereno told attendees here at the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology what his team has discovered about Gobero since he unveiled the finds in 2008.

Further excavation at the site, which spans the time from around 10,000 to 5,000 years ago, is on hold until Niger stabilizes politically, but the team has been busy working on materials recovered previously. One area of focus is pollen analysis, because the site preserves a rich pollen record. Sereno and his colleagues concluded that the individuals in the triple burial had been placed atop flowers based on pollen found in the grave. More recently, pollen recovered from a burial of a 10-year-old girl wearing an exquisite bracelet fashioned from a hippo tusk revealed that holly was placed under her feet and head. This holly has not turned up anywhere else at the site.

The team has also been analyzing the hardened plaque on the teeth of the Gobero individuals to piece together what they ate. And studies of pea-size structures called otoliths from fish remains, which preserve annual and seasonal growth rings, reveal when people caught the fish—data that are aiding in the reconstruction of how the Gobero diet changed throughout the year.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Analyses of a skeleton of an adult female, meanwhile, have shown that she was shot in the leg with a stone projectile. Whether the incident was accidental or intentional remains unclear, but Sereno is hoping to figure out exactly what kind of projectile was used. Artifacts found at the site include large projectile points and tiny microliths, as well as a number of different kinds of harpoons—none of which scientists expected to see in a population of this age in this part of the world.

The picture emerging from these and other findings suggests that the ancient Gobero people settled mostly in one place (as opposed to being nomadic), by the shores of this ancient lake. They used a wider variety of tools than previously thought and sustained themselves without growing food. Instead they lived as hunter-gatherers. Meanwhile, at a site just a couple hundred miles north of Gobero called Adrar Bous, people were subsisting as cattle herders. “These were contemporary populations living very differently,” Sereno observes.

Many of these finds might not have come to light if not for the combination of traditional and unorthodox excavation techniques Sereno employed. When his team happened upon the spectacular Stone Age cemetery while hunting for dinosaurs, the archaeologists he contacted about it were not happy. Sereno wanted to incorporate excavation methods he employs when digging up dinosaurs and other fossilized animals, removing blocks of sediment containing the fragile skeletons, covering them with protective plaster jackets and sending them to his lab in Chicago for preparation. He envisioned doing a special kind of preparation that exposes the bones on either side of the slab while preserving the original positions of the bones. "They thought I would destroy the site," he told Scientific American. The usual archaeological approach would be to photograph the skeletons in situ and then remove them bone by bone from their resting spots. Sereno felt it was important to save not just the bones, but also the elaborate poses of the skeletons, the placement of the artifacts, and other precious evidence. “I wanted to preserve it for [Niger]” and minimize the loss of information, he says. Eventually, the original fossils will be returned to Niger and put on public display, and Sereno will keep a cast of the remains.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe