Malaria-carrying mosquitoes might be splitting into new species

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


By any other name, the Anopheles gambiae mosquito would still bear—with its tiny buzzing wing beats—the deadly threat of malaria, which can be passed to humans in a single blood-sucking bite. But what if this species were to split in twain?

Two new studies, published online October 21 in Science, have found evidence that A. gambiae, which is one of the major carriers of the malaria parasite in sub-Saharan Africa, is evolving in two directions. The species has long been known to consist of several different subtypes of closely related mosquitoes. After careful genetic analysis, it appears that the Mopti (M) and Savanna (S) varieties of this insect might be on a path to become distinct species.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The two types are physically and developmentally "indistinguishable"—they have been observed "even flying in the same mating swarms," noted the researchers of one study. Only genetic differences reveal a difference between them.

"We can see that mosquitoes are evolving more quickly than we thought," Mara Lawniczak, of the Division of Cell and Molecular Biology at the Imperial College London and co-author of the first study, said in a prepared statement. She and her colleagues studied the genomes of the two varieties and detected more genetic differences between the two strains than would have been expected given their frequent geographical overlap.

The second group of researchers compared key genetic differences between these two A. gambiae types (in addition to the Bamako strain, which falls into the S subtype). Their study found that, based on genetic sites that seemed to have changed the most, the mosquitoes might be diverging in part due to habitat differences.

"It's important to identify and monitor these hidden genetic changes in mosquitoes if we are to succeed in bringing malaria under control by targeting mosquitoes," Lawniczak said. Some 247 million people were infected with malaria as of 2008, according to the World Health Organization, and it is implicated in about one million deaths each year.

"Unfortunately, strategies that might work against one strain of mosquito might not be effective against the other," Lawniczak said. Nevertheless, a more refined picture of mosquito genetic makeup—and mutation—could lead to more targeted intervention in the future.

"Our studies help us to understand the makeup of the mosquitoes that transmit malaria," George Christophides, also of Imperial College London and co-author of the first study, said in a prepared statement. And that, in turn, they hope will help them "find new ways of preventing them from infecting people."

Image of two types of Anopheles gamiae mosquito courtesy of Jim Gathany/CDC

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe