NASA's shuttle program counts down 'til the end

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


KENNEDY SPACE CENTER—If I'd jumped, I could have touched the belly of the Discovery. Of course, I would have then been escorted unceremoniously from the Orbiter Processing Facility. But I was that close. What a strange mix of thrill and melancholy it was to see those heat-shield tiles, the swoop of the delta wing, and the snub nose wrapped in black. This was the spacecraft that launched the Hubble Space Telescope and made its last trip into space in February. Next year it'll be off to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, just sitting back trying to recapture a little of the glory of.

With Discovery's twin, Endeavour, set to embark Friday on the shuttle program's second-to-last mission, the collective journalist storyline has already coalesced around how everyone feels about the program's imminent end. If you know space reporters, that's jarring. These guys out-engineer the engineers. They're usually asking about RTLS to the SLF, not emotions. Now they commiserate with NASA types they've known for years, decades, who are getting their pink slips. Asked at this morning's press conference how he felt, shuttle launch director Mike Leinbach said, “It's kind of sad to see it end, but we're dealing with it.” The next question concerned turbulence in the boundary layer during re-entry at Mach 18, but then it was back to how Leinbach felt. “It'll be a lot less fun to be working in,” he said. “It's like breaking up a family.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Stephanie Stilson, the engineer in charge of getting the Discovery safe for mass consumption, told us about how the spacecraft that looks so sleek on the outside is a veritable Superfund site on the inside. They've taken out all the rocket engines, tanks, fuel cells, even the toilets—anything that might contain hazardous materials. The nozzles that museum visitors will see are just for show. The payload bay doors will have to be supported by steel beams—they were designed to be opened in zero-gravity. But inevitably the conversation came around to how Stilson feels. When Discovery rolls out next year, it won't be back. “It's like having a child go off to college,” she said.

When our press tour got to pad 39B, one of the two Apollo and shuttle launch sites, one reporter exclaimed, "It's so sad." The gantry is already half dismantled. While we were there, we saw bits of metal pipe fall to the ground. It looks nothing like what the old pictures show. The project manager, Jose Perez Morales, described how future rockets—whatever they may be—won't need a fixed service tower. They'll have a mobile tower that will roll out with the rocket.

The shuttle program had to end. It was magnificent yet flawed from the start. "In all those 30 years, we never ventured more than 300 miles from the surface of the Earth," notes Jim Ball, the NASA manager who's trying to figure out what the Kennedy Space Center will do next. Though he didn't say it, it's an unenviable task. No one knows what comes next.

Images: The Vehicle Assembly Building at KSC, George Musser

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe