New recipe looks back for how to feed the world

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When it comes to feeding Earth's masses of people who regularly go hungry, a few things are clear: communism's large-scale, collective farms don't work, and breeding for specific traits in staple crops can boost yields, sometimes significantly. After all, two of the most significant agricultural successes of the past 50 years—a period marked by explosive population growth—were the redistribution of land in China to 160 million peasant families and the Green Revolution touched off by Norman Borlaug's pioneering work with wheat.

The former boosted yields and contributed to the massive reduction in poverty in the world's most populous nation over the past 30 years, whereas the latter is responsible for preventing predicted famines in Asia, among other regions, according to a new analysis of agricultural successes by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Since the 1950s, whereas global population has grown to more than six billion people, the large fraction suffering from malnutrition has shrunk from one third to one sixth. And although the total number of people suffering from malnutrition remained the same—one billion—this means some five billion people, more than the entire population of the planet in 1950, get enough food to eat today.

Although the "Green Revolution" and similar improvements to staple crops, like hybrid rice in China, are probably the most successful efforts in terms of feeding more people, other food wins include:

•    planting indigenous shrubs and trees to rehabilitate arid farmland in Burkina Faso and Niger, as well as community forestry in Nepal, enabling sustainable livelihoods and forests

•    zero-till soy farming in Argentina that now covers some 18 million hectares and has reduced erosion and soil fertility loss

•    the spread of mung bean cultivation in Asia as well as improved strains of maize in East Africa

•    vaccination against rinderpest in cattle and its eventual eradication

•    the development of faster-growing farmed tilapia in the Philippines

•    home gardening and livestock raising in Bangladesh to boost nutrition for 5 million people

"Each of these cases tells a different story of what worked, how and why," said IFPRI's David Spielman, coeditor of the book "Millions Fed: Proven Successes in Agriculture," in a prepared statement. "While no single story offers a complete solution to ending hunger, each one illustrates the importance of combined approaches to achieve success, including good science, collaboration, visionary leadership, community action, and progressive policies."

With world population set to grow to at least nine billion by 2050, repeating these recipes for agricultural successes—while reducing hunger and malnutrition, combating climate change and improving livelihoods—may prove an even greater challenge.

Image: Steve Mirsky

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe