Our Future in Space Will Echo Our Future on Earth

A spacefaring civilization can be expected to transform its home planet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Given that the half-century-old technology embodied in Voyager 1 and 2 recently traversed the boundary between the solar wind and the interstellar medium, it is likely that within the next century our civilization will exit the solar system boundary, marked by the Oort cloud, a thousand times farther away. Venturing into interstellar space will signal our transition from a sun-based residence to the grander neighborhood of other stars in the Milky Way galaxy.

And there may be alien traffic out there.

There is no doubt that we will ultimately be forced to relocate as a result of a major catastrophe on Earth, such as the sun boiling off the oceans in less than a billion years, a giant asteroid impact within hundreds of millions of years, a technologically-inflicted climate change within thousands of years or a global nuclear war within tens or hundreds of years. The only uncertainty is the timescale over which such a migration will be forced upon us.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On October 19, 2017, we discovered the first interstellar object in the solar system, ‘Oumuamua. As I have argued in recent papers, ‘Oumuamua could possibly be a message in a bottle from another civilization, swept to our solar system shore. Over the next century, we will likely develop the ability to send our own technological bottles to the shores of other planetary systems.

Such spacecraft might include robots equipped with 3-D printers, allowing them to use the raw materials they scoop elsewhere to make artificial objects based on blueprints from carried with them from Earth. We could also populate these spacecraft with tiny astronauts in the form of microbes that can establish colonies of life elsewhere. Artificial seeding of life-as-we-know-it would constitute so-called “directed panspermia.”

But long before we accomplish these goals in space, our society on Earth will likely be transformed by the same technological advances that will enable these space missions.

Consider, for example, robots. The next major revolution in the structure of human societies on Earth will likely result from robots replacing human labor. Robots are already starting to dislodge humans on construction sites, and their share of the labor market (along with artificial intelligence, or AI) will grow rapidly, as their technology improves exponentially on a timescale of a few years. Given the increasing share of robots and AI in the labor market, humans will need to restructure society. With less work to do thanks to robots and computers, there will be less opportunity to earn money as a reward for labor.  The workweek will have to shrink to less than five days out of seven. This will lead to more vacation time and less work for hire.

Governments may contemplate paying their citizens a minimum guaranteed income floor that is unrelated to work. Such an arrangement would constitute a new form of socialism. Karl Marx famously said, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” but the updated version might go “everyone gets more than the minimum they need and does whatever they want in their spare time.”

The seeds for this societal transformation are already apparent in Silicon Valley, where trillions of dollars of wealth were created over the past decade out of computer and internet technologies. This new money is very different from old money, which was generated over a longer period of time by older people who had traditional roots. Sergey Brin, Steve Jobs, Larry Page or Mark Zuckerberg have little in common with the old money of the Roosevelts, the Forbes, the DuPonts or the Rothschilds.

Rapidly growing technologies are already encountering some pushback through nostalgia for the old world order, embodied in populist political movements. But so far, our civilization has demonstrated a tendency to progress to a more advanced technological future. We could also be inspired to do so by detecting signals from a more advanced alien civilization and realizing that we are not the “smartest kid on the block.”

Here’s hoping that our future economy and societal structure will adjust successfully to the new technological advances. Our challenges in space build upon our successful management of the preceding societal challenges on Earth. If we can endure the technological revolution of computers and robots, we might conquer the Milky Way galaxy. If not, our unfortunate societal future on Earth will provide a sober explanation to Fermi’s century-old paradox: “Where is everybody?”

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, founding director of Harvard University’s Black Hole Initiative, and the former chair of the Harvard astronomy department (2011-2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He has published more than a thousand peer-reviewed papers and is the bestselling author of Extraterrestrial and Interstellar and a co-author of the textbooks Life in the Cosmos and The First Galaxies in the Universe.

More by Avi Loeb

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe