Scientists, Have We Got a Challenge for You!

Can you explain a complex scientific concept to 11-year-olds without making their eyes glaze over?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


What if a group of children asked you to explain a complex science concept? Could you do it in a clear and entertaining way, one that was specifically geared toward kids?

The Flame Challenge™  is an international competition in which scientists are asked to do just that: tackle a technical question in a way that engages an audience of 11-year-olds. And that is exactly who judges the entries and decides on the winners: thousands of fifth and sixth graders from all over the globe.

The contest began in 2012, when actor and science communicator Alan Alda was asked to write an article for Science magazine. He recalled being 11 himself, and deeply curious about what flames were; he asked his teacher, who thought for a moment and replied, "It's oxidation." Still frustrated over that answer decades later, Alda used the article as a challenge to scientists: do a better job than his teacher had answering that question for an 11-year-old audience. This was the start of an annual contest, run by the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science at Stony Brook University, designed to force scientists to sharpen their communication skills. Each year, 11-year-olds pose a new question to scientists who then compete to answer it in a way that is not only accurate but also engaging and clear. The question for the 2018 Challenge is “What is Climate?”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kids and teachers love participating in the Challenge, of course, but its core goals are to give scientists an opportunity to engage a specific audience, get feedback from that audience to sharpen their communication skills, and acquire the tools they need to engage a variety of future audiences.

The Challenge illustrates one of the most important aspects of effective communication, which is the ability to communicate in a clear, vivid and engaging way. Too often, scientists intuitively rely on jargon to communicate the complexities of climate and other complex scientific issues, frequently losing the interest of their intended audience.

Our partnership with Scientific American on this series of blog posts will provide an important forum for illustrating the importance of communicating science in clear, vivid and engaging ways. This year’s Challenge on climate—arguably one of the most significant and contentious issues facing society—will showcase the creative ways that scientists communicate about the topic, and highlight best practices that will inform the efforts of other science communicators.

This year’s Challenge will be providing training videos to guide participating scientists through the biggest communication obstacles and help them craft their best possible entry. The latest video, “Jargon Police,” is available today! View the video and play the Jargon Police game. You can also access “Meet an 11-year-old,” our video focused on knowing your audience, and make use of its accompanying worksheet.

Our video on landing your message with your audience, “Make it Snap,” will be released next month.

Registration is open now at flamechallenge.authorea.com/signup_flame_scientist. The deadline for entries is March 16, 2018.

More information? flamechallenge.org 

Questions?  flamechallenge@stonybrook.edu

The Flame Challenge™  is sponsored in part by the American Chemical Society.

 

 

About Nancee Moes

Nancy Moes, MFA, is the coordinator of the 2018 Flame Challenge and an Improvisation Instructor for the Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science where she teaches undergraduate science students, pushing them to develop skills in presence, audience connection, and personal investment. She also serves on the Alda Improv Team where she works developing both undergraduate and graduate curricula,

More by Nancee Moes
About Todd Newman

Todd P. Newman, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Alda Center. He holds a PhD in Communication from American University. Todd's research focuses on the intersection of science, the media, and society. Specifically, he looks at the relationship between individual values and beliefs, information exposure, and opinion formation within the context of contested science and environmental issues, as well as the role of scientists as public communicators.

More by Todd Newman

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe