The scent of death? Newly discovered natural chemicals make mosquitoes bug out

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A lot of communication in the animal world occurs via volatile, information-carrying "scent" chemicals, many of which remain to be chemically identified. Generally speaking, pheromones are a type of infochemical used within a species to influence social behaviors and attract mates whereas kairomones send signals between different species and are often used to detect predators and prey. Scientists have now identified two kairomones produced by a common mosquito predator, which effectively repel mosquitoes. The findings may hold the key to developing new, environmentally friendly insect repellents.

When female mosquitoes are ready to reproduce, they seek out suitable water in which to deposit their eggs. Previous studies have shown that if the mosquitoes chemically detect the presence of their water-borne predator, known as a backswimmer (Notonecta maculata), they are less likely to lay eggs in that location. The identity of the chemical cues released by the backswimmers has not been determined, however.

Leon Blaustein, professor of ecology at the University of Haifa in Israel and his colleagues collected air samples above a pool of backswimmers and identified some of the volatile chemicals present. The team then tested the ability of two of the identified chemicals, alone or in combination, to deter egg-laying Culiseta longiareolata mosquitoes from outdoor pools of water in experimental plastic tubs. The researchers found that pools containing both chemicals were most effective, reducing the number of mosquito eggs by half as compared with control pools containing only water. The chemical combo was nearly as effective in deterring mosquitoes as pools containing adult backswimmers. The findings were published online July 2 in Ecology Letters.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors acknowledge that while the kairomones may reduce the mosquitoes' immediate risk of predation by backswimmers, they increase the possibility that the females will die by other causes in their search for new water to lay eggs in. "That's why we think these chemicals could be a useful part of a strategy to control the population size of mosquitoes," Rockefeller University professor and co-author Joel Cohen said in a prepared statement. "These newly identified compounds, and others that remain to be discovered, might be effective in controlling populations of disease-carrying insects. It's far too soon to say, but there's the possibility of an advance in the battle against infections disease."

Image of a mosquito courtesy of the U.S. National Parks Service.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe