The space shuttle's final flight, and Scientific American will be there

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If Atlantis were lifting off on any other flight, its space station resupply mission would be considered routine at best, mundane at worst. No doubt, it would be given only cursory coverage by the mainstream media. But when the solid boosters ignite and STS 135 carries four astronauts into orbit (scheduled for July 8, 11:26 A.M. Eastern time), this mission will be anything but. Atlantis’s flight, the 135th of the 30-year shuttle program, will mark the culmination of a half century of almost continuous U.S. manned spaceflight that began in 1961, when Alan Shepard was lobbed into a 15-minute ballistic suborbital trajectory over the Atlantic.

This launch is important and historic because it marks the end, not the beginning, of an era of U.S. human space exploration. And a doleful finale it is, because an American space transportation system is being retired without a clear set of mission goals and programs, nor the political will, to make NASA once again an agency primarily dedicated to space exploration beyond Earth orbit.

FINAL FLING: With space shuttle Atlantis in the background, the STS 135 astronauts answer questions from the news media at Launch Pad 39A. They are, from left: Mission Specialists Rex Walheim and Sandy Magnus, Pilot Doug Hurley and Commander Chris Ferguson. Credit: NASA TV


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although the popularity of space exploration peaked in 1968 with the flight of Apollo 8 and declined precipitously after the first moon landing, many Americans have generally accepted the reality that humans must have access to orbit as a fact of modern life. But although the U.S. got five space shuttles and what will be 135 flights for around $195 billion, they have not been enthusiastic about putting more public treasure and human capital into manned exploration beyond low Earth orbit. It will be interesting to see how the new reality sets in after Atlantis touches down and is mothballed and mounted at the Kennedy Space Center. What will visitors think when they see the space plane, like its orbit-hardened sister ships Discovery and Endeavour, as a museum piece—a tribute to the past, rather than a harbinger of the future?

The shuttles hardly ventured into unexplored territory. Nevertheless, they ushered in great technological triumph, and twice saw human tragedy—all within 400 kilometers from home. Scientific American, which has chronicled human progress since 1845, will be covering this history-making mission from Kennedy Space Center. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe