Tiger sharks can relocate familiar hunting spots from several kilometers away

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Wandering the neighborhood randomly is not usually the best strategy to find a great dinner—especially if you live in a place where such meals are few and far between.

The resulting trajectory, known in mathematics as "a random walk," does not always make for the best use of time and energy, particularly in locations where resources can be scarce, such as the open ocean. But a more purposeful "directed walk" to a destination takes a pretty sophisticated memory and spatial sense (or a device with GPS) that many animals don't have.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


New research, however, shows that thresher and tiger sharks are actually quite adept at highly directed swimming, with tiger sharks finning it over to a familiar spot from six to eight kilometers away within a home territory that covers hundreds or even thousands of square kilometers.

Demonstrating that an animal is traveling directly to a desired destination—rather than stumbling on it accidentally—is challenging, given communication barriers and the fact that even straight paths are not always part of a purposeful travel pattern. To find out whether sharks were always circling their home range randomly or were intentionally returning to a place they remembered to offer food, shelter or mates, a team of researchers used fractal analysis to assess old GPS tracking data from three shark species: tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier), thresher sharks (Alopias vulpinus) and blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus). Tracking for each individual shark lasted for at least seven hours.

"Our research shows that, at times, tiger sharks and thresher sharks don't swim randomly but swim to specific locations," Yannis Papastamatiou, of the Florida Museum of Natural History and co-author of the new study, said in a prepared statement. "Simply put, they know where they're going."

How do the sharks do it? Papastamatiou and his team suggest that the sharks with larger ranges making shorter trips could be darting to their destinations working off of clues from water currents, temperature, magnetic fields and perhaps even smell. But when sharks are making long and apparently purposeful treks, they might be making use of "cognitive maps, requiring good spatial memory and awareness of features in their home range," the researchers noted in their paper.

The researchers also found that thresher sharks in particular weren't necessarily born knowing how to find the hotspots. Adult threshers seemed to use "directed walk" much more often than the younger ones. "We believe it shows that adults have learned to navigate more effectively than juveniles, or have developed better mental maps of the area where they live," Papastamatiou said.

The results were gleaned from 34 study sharks, and some might have been exploring new territory during the tracking, which would increase the likelihood that they would use a "random walk" approach. But other anecdotal evidence supports the idea that some sharks make the most of their large territories by developing cognitive maps of resource-rich areas.

The ability to re-find food sources is not uncommon among larger land animals. But pinpointing marine predators that can do it is a newer development. "Many people could walk to a known destination 6 to 8 kilometers away, but imagine doing it in deep water and at night," Papastamatiou said.

And like people, the sharks seemed to vary widely in their individual ability to arrive directly at their destination.

The findings were published online March 1 in the Journal of Animal Ecology.

Image of blacktip reef shark, one of the three species in the study, courtesy of Yannis Papastamatiou

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe