Today's Polar Bears Started Out Brown and Irish

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Polar bears' "mitochondrial Eve," the female from whom all of today's polar bears are descended, was not a polar bear at all.

On July 7 researchers published their findings about the species history of polar bears in Current Biology. One of their discoveries was that the mitochondrial DNA in the cells of every polar bear's body originated in the cells of a female brown bear that lived in the neighborhood of Britain and Ireland during the era when Neandertals' numbers began go dwindle.

Mitochondrial DNA is passed on directly from mother to offspring—unmixed with any male input, unlike the DNA found in the cell nucleus—which means researchers can use it to trace the maternal line back through history.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By comparing the sequences in the mitochondrial DNA of 242 bears, ranging from living animals to fossils (living over a period of time spanning 120,000 years), from all across the globe, researchers could discover when and where modern polar bears' mitochondrial lineage originated. This photograph shows one of the Irish caves where bear fossils were found.

In the past 100,000 years, matings among brown and polar bears have successfully produced hybrid offspring, the analysis revealed. One of these matings occurred 20,000 to 50,000 years ago, and the entire modern population of polar bears is descended from the female half. The brown bears that shared the mitochondrial lineage of this polar bear ancestress have since died out, as have polar bears whose mitochondrial DNA stemmed from a different source.

The interspecies hybridization that begat today's polar bears was possible because of climate fluctuations. Although brown bears need habitats with a warmer climate than their polar cousins, shifts in temperature could push the two populations into proximity by rendering their natural habitats unlivable. For example, an increase in temperature would melt Arctic ice, leading polar bears to seek land-based homes farther south. A cooler period, on the other hand, would make parts of Ireland uninhabitable for the brown bears while facilitating the spread of glaciers, driving brown bears to new habitats such as on the ice shelves formed by the glacier in the Irish Sea basin.

"The bottom line is that the two species bumped up against one another for extended periods of time on different occasions, sharing both habitats and genes," Beth Shapiro, a biologist at Pennsylvania State University, said in a prepared statement. Shapiro, along with Daniel Bradley of Trinity College Dublin, led a team of scientists from both coasts of the U.S. and across Europe.

Brown and polar bear hybrids still exist today. Although brown and polar bears have been known to mate and produce offspring when living together in captivity, wild hybrids are more rare. In fact, the first wild hybrid sighting did not occur until 2006, when an Idahoan hunter shot one in Canada. In the past five years, however, more wild hybrids have been spotted.

Some conservationists would like hybrids to join polar bears on lists of endangered species (polar bears are currently classified as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act). As for polar bears, their ability to survive climate change may get a boost from this research. Understanding how polar bears coped with changing ice distributions thousands of years ago could help scientists predict how they will respond to future change.

Bears are no strangers to travel, having spread from Europe across the globe over the course of more than 100,000 years. This video illustrates their diffusion.

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe