Trump and the Tide of History

In rejecting the Paris climate accords, our government has ceded moral, ethical, economic, and political leadership to other, more enlightened countries.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In two of the most famous lines in Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar,” Brutus notes the importance of watching the ebb and flow of the tide of history, and acting at the right time:

"There is a tide in the affairs of men.

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound in shallows and in miseries."

President Donald J. Trump has withdrawn the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement, and the United States will miss the rising tide that will carry almost all other countries of this world towards a more secure and sustainable future. A President who ran on the promise to “Make America great again”  left America diminished, isolated in the world, distrusted by our closest friends and allies. The American government ignored the will of most of its own people, stepped off the world stage, and kicked the can of human-caused climate change down the road. Our government ceded moral, ethical, economic, and political leadership to other, more enlightened countries.

It was a sad day if you are a climate scientist, and you’ve spent most of your adult life studying the nature and causes of climate change. The overwhelming scientific evidence of a human-caused global warming signal was ignored. The risks of dangerous human interference in the climate system were ignored. Science and rationality lost; willful ignorance and narrow self-interest won.

It was a sad day if you believe—as I do—that the United States is part of a community of nations, and cannot ignore the global problems threatening all of us. It was a sad day if you believe that it’s unfair to burden future generations with dangerous climate change they did nothing to incur. It was a sad day for Americans who believe—as I do—that U.S. jobs will not be created by turning back the clock and embracing antiquated energy-production sources. We cannot make coal great again; nor can we make the horse and buggy great again.  

This day is significant. A century from now, future historians will look at the decision by President Trump. They will study how this decision changed the arc of history, and changed the trajectory of earth’s climate system. They will see who stood for a sustainable climate future, and who stood for short-term profit and political self-interest. The future historians will know how it all turned out—whether things ended poorly for much of humanity, or whether the U.S. “Parexit” decision was a temporary aberration, and quickly led to more enlightened U.S. leadership.

Our President owns casinos, hotels, and golf courses. He does not own our atmosphere and our oceans. Those are part of the global commons. The health of that global commons concerns all of us. With the decision to leave the Paris Climate Agreement, the President has seriously jeopardized the health of the atmosphere and oceans we share with other citizens of this planet. Tomorrow begins the hard work of ensuring that the United States is not “bound in shallows and in miseries”, rejoins the family of nations, and is lifted on the rising tide of a sustainable energy and climate future.     

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe