Vitamin D deficiency linked to genetic polymorphisms

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


At least half of adults in developed countries have deficient levels of vitamin D, and low levels of this vitamin have been linked to bone fragility, cancer, heart disease and immune system problems. Variable levels of vitamin D, which is a by-product of a chemical reaction that occurs when UV light hits the skin and can be found in some fatty fish, across populations has largely been thought to be a simple matter of exposure: failure to get enough sun, eat fatty fish or take supplements would result in deficiency.

Previous research has suggested that vitamin D levels were inherited, in part, but a new study of 33,996 people has found three specific genetic variants that seem to correlate with a person's levels of vitamin D.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers ran a genome-wide association assay of 16,125 people from five centers in the U.S., Canada and Europe and found that three genetic polymorphisms were associated with varying levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, a biomarker used to test for levels of the vitamin itself. The researchers, led by Thomas Wang, of the Division of Cardiology in the Department of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, also ran the same tests on another two batches of five cohorts each and found that the results replicated.

"The presence of harmful alleles at the three confirmed loci more than doubled the risk of vitamin D insufficiency," the researchers noted in their study, published online June 9 in The Lancet.

The genes in question (DHCR7/NADSYN1, CYP2R1 and GC) were involved in cholesterol synthesis, hydroxylation and vitamin D transport, respectively.

These findings were somewhat "unexpected," especially that none of the genes were linked to skin pigmentation or any of the major diseases implicated in vitamin D deficiency, Roger Bouillon, of the Clinic and Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in Belgium, noted in a commentary that appeared in the same issue of The Lancet. The new findings "only partly explain the wide variability of vitamin D status," he concluded.

The authors of the study agreed that the issue requires further study to shed light on the biological basis of the so-called sunshine vitamin. "Whether genetic predisposition modifies response to sun exposure or dietary supplementation warrants further study," the researchers wrote. "These variants might provide useful genetic approaches to investigate the role of vitamin D insufficiency in several chronic diseases."

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/lakovKalinin

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe