Voyager 1′s Whereabouts: No News, but Plenty of Noise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Tracking the location of the Voyager 1 spacecraft can be exhausting for a science journalist, and I can only imagine how confusing it gets for the interested reader. The relevant question pertaining to Voyager 1’s location is this: Has the venerable NASA spacecraft exited the heliosphere, the sun’s plasma cocoon in space, and crossed into the interstellar medium? The answer has swung for years between variations on “no” and “maybe,” most recently landing on “not yet” when mission scientists unveiled the latest data from the probe in a December teleconference.

So a press release this morning from the American Geophysical Union, proclaiming that “Voyager 1 has left the solar system,” caught my attention. (The headline was later revised to state that “Voyager 1 has entered a new region of space.”) The gist of the release: a new study in Geophysical Research Letters, analyzing cosmic ray data from Voyager 1, concludes that the probe “appears to have travelled beyond the influence of the Sun and exited the heliosphere.” On August 25, 2012, Voyager 1 registered a precipitous drop in local cosmic rays (charged particles accelerated to high energies) and an increase in cosmic rays from interstellar space.

The data are intriguing, but the interpretation is problematic. Voyager project scientists have been aware of the August changeover for months and have already offered more mundane explanations for the cosmic-ray data. “Voyager has discovered a new region of the heliosphere that we had not realized was there,” Voyager project scientist Ed Stone of the California Institute of Technology said in December. “We’re still inside, apparently.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At that time, the researchers noted that the particle data were indeed compelling but that magnetic-field data from Voyager 1 had not yet registered the kind of change expected at the boundary of the heliosphere. “If we had only looked at particle data alone, we would have said, ‘Well, we are out. Goodbye to the solar system,’” said Tom Krimigis of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

The Geophysical Research Letters study does just that—it looked at the particle data alone—so its conclusions should be taken with an interstellar grain of salt. And it is worth noting that the paper is somewhat more cautiously worded than its accompanying press release, claiming only that the boundary Voyager 1 crossed in August is “possibly related to the heliopause,” or the edge of the heliosphere.

In any case, a more comprehensive look at the boundary is forthcoming—studies from three instruments on Voyager 1, including the magnetometer, have been submitted to the journal Science. A Voyager scientist contacted today said that his team had not been informed about the preemptive Geophysical Research Letters paper.

Voyager 1 has ventured farther from Earth in its 35 years than any other man-made object, and when it does leave the heliosphere it will offer humankind our first taste of interstellar space. Given the importance of that accomplishment, I will await official word on Voyager 1’s location—as exhausting and confusing as waiting can be.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe